TalkBass has been independent since 1998. Add your voice.
Create a free account to reply to discussions, view embedded media, and browse with fewer display ads.
Join free Log in
Want zero display ads or expanded classifieds tools? Compare plans.
My 220 has the white switch and it's broken in the "always on" position. Much better than the a"always off" position!![]()
Define "stuck"; do you mean it is physically stuck or just doesn't work when you try to cut it off.
Mine had the 2nd problem, the power switch would go on and off physically but the amp stayed on.
Same, physically switches, no effect.
Mine had the 2nd problem, the power switch would go on and off physically but the amp stayed on. ... The power switch has a great big honkin ceramic cap from the switch to some other location. ... I pulled the chassis out of the shell/case (very easy to do) and found one of the legs of the cap had snapped off. I just resoldered that leg from the cap back on and it worked perfectly after that. ... Seemed like about a year after I stopped using it at practice ... the switch stopped working so I think just moving it around after sitting for a number of years managed to break that solder joint.
Something ain't quite right here ^^^ There should be a .01uF ceramic disc cap soldered across two of the SPDT power switch terminals (paralleled) in order to reduce switch contact pitting. If the switch is good and the cap is missing (or one leg breaks loose like you described) the amp should still turn on and off like normal until arcing takes out the internal contacts (amp won't turn on) or fuses them (amp won't turn off). If your amp doesn't turn on with one of the capacitor legs disconnected but does turn on (with the switch) when the cap is connected then it sounds like somebody wired it in series with the switch which would mean the cap really isn't doing anything useful.
Edited to remove previous stupidity
All I know is my power switch would not work, but if you plugged/unplugged the amp it would turn on and off.
I opened it up, found the big disc cap with one leg missing and resoldered it; then the power switch worked.
The amp was purchased new (in 1978), and had never been in a shop, before that or since. Now it works fine and has for about 10 years.
Bizarre, can't really explain that.
Here's a picture of the power switch and cap in my 320 which is identical to what's in my 220 and 330 and also consistent with those amps' power supply schematics. As you can see the disc cap is soldered across the middle and bottom terminals of the switch, parallel to the two wires.
The only other way I've seen them do it is in a 120 chassis where the cap was outboarded to that little multi-lug terminal strip in the foreground with the internal fuse, however the cap was still effectively paralleled across the switch terminals. Either way, these amps would still turn on/off if a cap lead was disconnected -- the power switch contacts would just arc and spark more.
I can't quite fathom why your 220 is different or what the function of the cap is in your case. The other odd thing is that a lead would have come loose at all... those terminations are usually soldered solidly in place.
View attachment 4489896
The big mystery (to me) is why one lead of the cap coming loose would prevent the switch from turning the amp on and off since I've never encountered an Acoustic amp with a disc cap in series with the power switch and ever seen one in a schematic. I can't imagine what's going on there.
I can't/won't use my 220 as a reference since when I got it the power switch had obviously been changed out, so all bets are off. I did just take a quick peek at my circa-1978 model 330 and see that connections to the power switch are via Quick Connect connectors crimped to the two wires rather than being soldered. Each lead of the disc cap was soldered to the outside surface of a QC connector before attaching to the switch terminals. But for whatever reason my late 1979-early 1980 model 320 in the picture above has the power wires and cap soldered directly to the switch, so perhaps they were addressing some reliability issues.
I hear you about the hard plastic feet. I'm usually a stickler for keeping things as original as safely possible but I usually do replace the bottom feet with rubber feet. That's crazy that your 220 survived a 5-foot drop test onto concrete, the marketing department could have really made hay with that testimonial.
@JacklegBass , I can't see any difference between this amp and my 126, other than the heat sinks on the power board. All the caps and transformers are the same value.
Congrats!Hello, my name is Stu and I am coming back to the fold this Sat. When I pick up my 1972 Acoustic Control Corp. 371 system!
In 1968-69 I purchased a ACC 360 system and when the 371 system came out I bought 1 head and 2 cabs, one for each side of the stage. I almost closed out the 70's with this system but in 1979 I just had to have the SVT with the 2 cabs, still one on each side of the stage. Anyway, I am returning to the fold, oh yeah, no picture it's not real, so this is my amp!View attachment 4491930

Thank you! I'm feeling very good about it!
Yessir, tone for days!Thank you! I'm feeling very good about it!
Heck my 11th grade was in 1967-68, so I was still running my Fender bassman with two 15's or maybe my 2- Ampeg B-15's.Yessir, tone for days!
I bought my cab new in 1973. I was in 11th grade. The head came a few years later.