I love my Chromes, but I'm unsure as to if they are long enough for thru body stringing. Great tone and feel otherwise.
They're long enough, I use them on my Hamer 2-TEK Cruisebass.
TalkBass has been independent since 1998. Add your voice.
Create a free account to reply to discussions, view embedded media, and browse with fewer display ads.
Join free Log in
Want zero display ads or expanded classifieds tools? Compare plans.
I love my Chromes, but I'm unsure as to if they are long enough for thru body stringing. Great tone and feel otherwise.
Flats are not supposed to be strung through the body! The sharp angle will separate the windings and the saddle, IMHO, not a good idea.
My favorites are TIs, and Sadowsky light-gauge. The Sads have great clarity and perfect tension, but I usually still prefer the texture and sound of the TIs.
Lakland JO - Low/Medium tension (between the Sadowsky & Pyramid), very smooth, not too bright, good life span (the set on my JO are over 1 year old)
I finally just bought one and the previous owner had just put TI's on it before he sold it to me. They're floppier than I'm used to, but I'm loving the tone and feel. I'm going to give them a good long trial before I make any decision but if I get used to the low tension they're going to stay on for quite a while.
True their quite firm but the taughtness seems to have improved my touch somewhat. I love em.....
Flats are not supposed to be strung through the body! The sharp angle will separate the windings and the saddle, IMHO, not a good idea.
My favorites are TIs, and Sadowsky light-gauge. The Sads have great clarity and perfect tension, but I usually still prefer the texture and sound of the TIs.
I've got Fender 9050ML flats through the body on my '51 reissue P-bass and while there is a sharp bend over the bridge the strings are fine, been on for months and no problems.
Funny that I absolutely _HATE_ the Fenders. I've tried them on three different basses and I can safely say that I don't like them. Again, to each their own.
KO
+1, I voted LaBella even though they say don't string though the body. Second choice D'A Chromes.My vote goes to the La Bella 760FS .45-105 set, great lows, smooth highs, flatwound thump and medium tension.
I've tried a few flat wound strings, and Labella's are easily my favorite. Keep in mind I was looking for a traditional thumpy P-bass sound, and that's exactly what Labella's deliver. Chromes tend to have more top end, and they're not bad by any means. Webstrings make a half-decent set of flatwounds for an unbelievable price too... very dead (but i mean that in a good way, they didn't seem to need much break in time), though they don't feel quite as nice as some others (particularly the Labellas). I know i might be in the minority, but I really didn't like TI's for this application. I'm sure they can "get" thumpy, but it's not their inherent character the way it is for Labellas, Fender, or even Chromes. The construction on TI's is top notch... they feel like very high quality strings, but they sound nothing like the other flats I've played on. Personally I like some tension on a set of strings... too little and I'll wind up bending notes flat without meaning to, and my pick doesn't get the necessary resistance needed in order to play with any amount of quickness. (Yes, i'm a pick player but so are a lot of the great flatwound players like carol kaye.) TI's have much more of a midrange sound, and without nearly as much thump or fullness as some of the others. I think they're a love it or hate it type of string.
My vote went to Labella's for overall feel, tone, thump, construction, and general awesomeness! Oh, I tried Fender Nylon tapewounds once too... basically roundwound strings with a layer of flat black nylon wound around the roundwound core... they gave a weird "plunky" sound. Played fingerstyle they were usable, but felt cheap to the fingers... with a pick I couldn't stand them. Not my cup of tea.