• TalkBass has been independent since 1998. Add your voice.
    Create a free account to reply to discussions, view embedded media, and browse with fewer display ads.
    Join freeLog in
    Want zero display ads or expanded classifieds tools? Compare plans.

The dead on Mt. Everest

Personally, I think it'd be amazing to climb Everest. The whole experience of being up there, above the clouds and see the surrounding must be amazing.

There are smaller, less dangerous mountains one could climb to get that view.

so, good place to hide a body.

Also a good place to ride a body.

images?q=tbn:ANd9GcQ9LdqM9QnOX5o632Ujv8a7tY2QIBOHLoTYxLR4eT2hbxIWuT4u5yRhvt86.jpg
 
It's actually a bit more than 1000 feet.
The death rates are also a lot lower than what your previous post stated.

Link Removed

That link doesn't even list K2 as an 8,000er, which it most certainly is. It's the 2nd tallest there is.


I've done a few climbs before, although nothing close to the height of Everest.
I've done Mt Washington a few times. Most notably in the middle of winter during a blizzard. That was fun!
Going up:
IMG_1612.jpg


At the summit:
IMG_1617.jpg


And going down:
IMG_1636.jpg


Those pictures are why it's one of the most dangerous mountains in the world. Very rapidly changing weather and very high wind speed. It was the record holder for fastest surface wind speed ever recorded up until a few years ago. No bodies sitting on the mountain though, but it's claimed 100 lives.

I did Mauna Kea on my honeymoon. It's the tallest mountain on earth from base to top.
I was scheduled to do Mt Rainer a few years ago, but had to cancel the trip.
I'd climb Everest or any of the Himalayas in a second if: 1. My wife would let me and 2. If I could afford it. K2 would be my first choice.

Why? Because it's awesome. It's setting out to do something extremely difficult and finishing it, under your own power. It's being outside in some of the most beautiful places you'll ever see. There is nothing like being in the mountains.
 
I would prefer to climb a nice big warm mountain. Anything that I could brag about later that kept a constant 65 degrees, light humidity, none of that silly alt sickness crap, hot tubs every 2-3000 feet or so to rest for the night with a cocktail. I'm willing to invest about 4-5 days max.

Which one was that again?

Skydive, bungy, hanglide, paraglide, no problem...done them all. Climb a crowded cold mountain that I can't snowboard down? Duuuude....wuh?
 
I'd like to do a few Munro's, which, while relatively small, are the largest mountains in Scotland (a Munro is a mountain over 3,000ft, the highest is ~4,400ft).

You clearly don't need to be anywhere near as advanced a climber as you do for the others listed in the thread, plus they are practically on the doorstep (though there are usually a few casualties each year, usually people getting lost, falling into a bog or not keeping a track of the weather).
 
I would prefer to climb a nice big warm mountain. Anything that I could brag about later that kept a constant 65 degrees, light humidity, none of that silly alt sickness crap, hot tubs every 2-3000 feet or so to rest for the night with a cocktail. I'm willing to invest about 4-5 days max.

Which one was that again?

None :)

I suppose Mt Mitchell in NC might give you the best chance of any of that. It's the tallest in NC, tallest in the Appalachians, and the tallest east of the Mississippi. Even Mauna Kea in Hawaii is pretty cold at the top and can involve alt sickness.

I went to climb Mt Marcy a few years ago in the Daks, upstate NY. Another winter climb. It was supposed to be -20°. It's 12 miles out and back so you really should start as far out on the mountain as you can, otherwise it would take you all day or longer. I went all the way out to base camp, set up my tent, and got situated for what was going to be a long and cold night. After a few hours of freezing my *** off I decided to call it quits. My sleeping bag wasn't rated for that kind of cold and I probably would have gotten sick. So I packed all my stuff up, hiked back to my truck, and drove the 4 hours to get home. What a waste!
 
None :)

I suppose Mt Mitchell in NC might give you the best chance of any of that. It's the tallest in NC, tallest in the Appalachians, and the tallest east of the Mississippi.

As a kid I went to Camp Modamin every summer and one year we hiked Linville Gorge to Mt Mitchell. To this day it's one of my favorite memories. I love the Pisgahs.
 
I would prefer to climb a nice big warm mountain. Anything that I could brag about later that kept a constant 65 degrees, light humidity, none of that silly alt sickness crap, hot tubs every 2-3000 feet or so to rest for the night with a cocktail. I'm willing to invest about 4-5 days max.

Which one was that again?

There's a camping ground not too far from where I am (edit: where my parents live, not used to not being there anymore) with three 2.6kft mountains. Replace hot tubs with lake and cocktail with hot beer and that's about it :p I've done two of them in the same day, it's more hiking trails then actual hiking. Sadly those are the highest peaks of the maritime provinces.
 
The less training, the greater the risk. Everest is a dump, and a far too crowded place for my tastes. It isn't even that beautiful. We should be happy that other big ones are simply too technical and demanding so that they won't ever be commercially exploited.

I've seen Annapurna 1 from the north glacier, with the sickle glacier on top, the Great Barrier to my left and the Nilgiris behind me. I've seen the 4k high south wall of Dhaulagiri. I've stood on French Pass looking at its massive north face. And that's only a small part of the Himalaya to begin with. The Himalaya is so big and so beautiful!! And not to forget the people living there, the nicest people I've met.

Why would anyone do things they aren't ready for?, such as climbing Everest? All respect to these people, but if you look at it, it's like asking for it.