• TalkBass has been independent since 1998. Add your voice.
    Create a free account to reply to discussions, view embedded media, and browse with fewer display ads.
    Join freeLog in
    Want zero display ads or expanded classifieds tools? Compare plans.

The end of tubes??? Thoughts?

I have been tempted by the PF20t. It will do for home practice and might be amendable to running into a dummy load and then into something to act purely as a power amp for bigger requirements. It's tempting to see if it could work as a small personal monitor, then most stuff direct from it (I have a speaker-level DI box) to FOH. However, in reality I will probably end up sticking with what I have.

I think you don't have to plug it in a dummy load, it's one of the rare full tube amp that doesn't require to be plugged into a speaker. Ideal for studio.
 
  • Like
Reactions: JimmyM
I have been tempted by the PF20t. It will do for home practice and might be amendable to running into a dummy load and then into something to act purely as a power amp for bigger requirements. It's tempting to see if it could work as a small personal monitor, then most stuff direct from it (I have a speaker-level DI box) to FOH. However, in reality I will probably end up sticking with what I have.

Currently my home practice louderiser is an acoustic guitar amp from a company known for its, er, inexpensive products. It's OK, but I can't get a flat response from it. So it's very tempting to change it up. Ideally I'd still like to be able to get something that is flat response too for when I don't want things to sound like an Ampeg, e.g., running guitar through a modeller. Playing over headphones does that, but it can be nice to have some physical separation of sound sources. But then I need a reasonably small, flat cab that can also sound good with a PF20t. So some thought required...

There's been a big jump in the cost of living so this might not be the year for it!
 
The US exports around $2.5 trillion in a typical year; that's a lot of jobs. Are you OK with US exports getting cut, say, in half? That is, of course, entailed by the idea that "nations should be more self-sufficient." Right?

No, it's not. Self sufficiency does not imply less exports. It is available by ensuring a wide variety of domestic manufacturing such that particular markets or key markets - say, those tied to food, defense, or energy - do not become import-only. You can still import those things as well, but the idea is to have domestic capacity if it becomes critical. With supply chain issued being a good example for the motivation.

Audio tubes are not of the kind of importance as food and energy of course, but the principle is the same.