I’m not using a board any more. Sold my LA-1A that needed the DC7 so now I can sell the DC7. Just going bass to tuner to REDDI. My 1 Spot can handle that.Any particular reason why?
TalkBass has been independent since 1998. Add your voice.
Create a free account to reply to discussions, view embedded media, and browse with fewer display ads.
Join free Log in
Want zero display ads or expanded classifieds tools? Compare plans.
I’m not using a board any more. Sold my LA-1A that needed the DC7 so now I can sell the DC7. Just going bass to tuner to REDDI. My 1 Spot can handle that.Any particular reason why?
Gotcha. Love my DC7.I’m not using a board any more. Sold my LA-1A that needed the DC7 so now I can sell the DC7. Just going bass to tuner to REDDI. My 1 Spot can handle that.
It’s the best power supply ever.Gotcha. Love my DC7.
A friend loaned me his Oracle. It doesn't work with my main basses, but with my more traditional basses it is a beast indeed.
Whoa. This is a goooood combination. Just got the Telefunken DI today. It's a smooth, punchy beast:
View attachment 4046773
Passive. I wish I had a way to record audio. Maybe some day.Passive or Active version? Looks hawt. Want to hear what it sounds like tho.
Passive. I wish I had a way to record audio. Maybe some day.
Plus, the combination looks cool together. Which, let’s be honest, is what really matters most, lol.
Passive. I wish I had a way to record audio. Maybe some day.
Plus, the combination looks cool together. Which, let’s be honest, is what really matters most, lol.
My main basses are a 6 string chambered bass and a 6 string semi hollow bass. I love the sound of these basses directly into the effects return of my Acoustic Image amp. It's a 900 watt Focus I. However, I do need some slight eq so this isn't ideal. I love the Demeter preamps because they have that 3D tube quality while staying clean. That fuzziness that surrounds the notes from an Ampeg circuit, like the Oracle does, sounds great to me with my P bass or PJ, but with my 6 string basses, which are my main basses, I want more of a clean sound, not a fuzzy sound. Even with the gain as low as I can get it, the Oracle has some fuzziness to it. That's just what it was designed to do. Also, the Oracle takes away some of the dynamic response of my playing, and that doesn't work for me. With a punchier, more traditional bass, this isn't really an issue.Can you expand a bit? What are your main basses, and why don't they play well with the Oracle?
5sg.
Ha ha, yeah. I have the Lightning Boy TI Box which is also great but have been curious about the Telefunken stuff for a bit.
Can you describe the sound in comparison to some of the other DIs you've tried? Enquiring minds want to know!
5sg.
Ha ha, yeah. I have the Lightning Boy TI Box which is also great but have been curious about the Telefunken stuff for a bit.
Who would have ever thought my band and church I play with and travel with would prefer my pedalboard setup of my Starlifter, Cali76, Shure Wireless and Thumpinator over a Ampeg Stack with a SVT Tube head and one of the Heritage 410 cabs lol. Drummer emphatically says its the best IEM and FOH tone he's ever heard.
Compared the TF to the IMP2 briefly. As I suspected, there's not really much of a comparison. The IMP2 sounds dead and lifeless by comparison. It cuts both lows and highs compared to the TF. The TF sounds rich, full, and punchy. Way more presence in the lows and highs for a rounder, fuller tone, and a great midrange punch. And it's a bit louder than the IMP2. Granted this is using my passive bass through both a Broughton SVPre and the Oracle. Not just plugging straight into the DI(s).Tomorrow I'll try to compare it to what I can. But you can't really compare just the TF DI to the SSDI. I could maybe compare the SSDI to the Oracle/TF combo, to what extent that would be helpful. The only other DI I currently have is an IMP2, which I ganked off my guitar board when I got the Oracle because the Oracle didn't have a dedicated DI out. For a few days, I was playing the Oracle and the SSDI through the IMP2 (line out on the SSDI to keep it a fair comparison). Going back and forth between the two, they are entirely comparable, just different. The SSDI's Fender tonestack vs the Oracle's James tonestack. Different flavors of punch and awesomeness. To simplify things the past couple of days, I was using a 1/4" out from the Oracle with a 1/4" to XLR converter plug and plugging that straight into my Rolls PM50. Let me assure there is NO comparison between that the the TF. I'll compare the Oracle through the IMP2 and TF tomorrow, though I'm sure the comparison won't be fair. I already know based on memory of playing the Oracle through the IMP2 that the TF will be warmer and fatter, with more presence. The IMP cuts some lows, I think. The IMP is fine for an electric guitar board that I haven't even left the house with in like 5yrs. But I wouldn't use it for bass when there are better options readily available.
Who would have ever thought my band and church I play with and travel with would prefer my pedalboard setup of my Starlifter, Cali76, Shure Wireless and Thumpinator over a Ampeg Stack with a SVT Tube head and one of the Heritage 410 cabs lol. Drummer emphatically says its the best IEM and FOH tone he's ever heard.
Compared the TF to the IMP2 briefly. As I suspected, there's not really much of a comparison. The IMP2 sounds dead and lifeless by comparison. It cuts both lows and highs compared to the TF. The TF sounds rich, full, and punchy. Way more presence in the lows and highs for a rounder, fuller tone, and a great midrange punch. And it's a bit louder than the IMP2. Granted this is my using my passive bass through both a Broughton SVPre and the Oracle. Not just plugging straight into the DI(s).
Plugging my passive jazz V straight into both DI's, the difference is a bit more pronounced. The IMP sounds fine. It's very "crisp," and does lose some low end extension. The TF, on the other hand, sounds much fuller, with a fuller low end. It does roll off some highs, but not in an offensive way. It sounds warm, full, and punchy. If I were doing some low-budget recording, I wouldn't hesitate to show up with just the TF, since most things are done post these days anyway. It sounds great.
What does "punchy" mean?