• TalkBass has been independent since 1998. Add your voice.
    Create a free account to reply to discussions, view embedded media, and browse with fewer display ads.
    Join freeLog in
    Want zero display ads or expanded classifieds tools? Compare plans.

The Official 2012 NHL Stanely Cup Finals Thread

Status
Not open for further replies.
This is my take away img from this series.

giroux_medium.gif
 
I think the distinct kicking rule is legitimate and have no issue with it. This isn't soccer and although deflections and bounces can happen, if you are actively trying to use your skate to kick in a puck then that's not a hockey play in my eyes.

I do wonder with last night, couldn't Neil have been called for goalie interference though? He was clearly in the crease and restricting Lundqvist's ability to make the save. It seems like Neil's skate, which may not have hit the puck, was certainly affecting Henrik's glove hand. Either way.... I just found it curious.

I'm not much of a Devils fan, but I'd like to see them win the series. You never know when it may be Brodeur's last season. He has made some questionable plays during that series as well... age may be getting the best of him.
 
... I do wonder with last night, couldn't Neil have been called for goalie interference though? He was clearly in the crease and restricting Lundqvist's ability to make the save. It seems like Neil's skate, which may not have hit the puck, was certainly affecting Henrik's glove hand. Either way.... I just found it curious....
If the puck is in the crease, skaters can be in the crease and freely play for the puck. That includes screening,digging, poking, pushing the puck from the goalie's glove etc, until the refs blows the whistle. 100s of goals are scored like that every season.
 
I finally watched the controversial goal from the Sens Rangers game. The NBC analyst is pretty adamant about there being interference on Lundqvist, but I don't really see how.

HOWEVER, how on earth did they botch the kick and call this a good goal?! He kicked the puck right in lol.
 
He "shuffleboards" Lundqvist with his stick as he's kicking at the puck. Lundqvist's pads are on the ice and he gets spun and dirtected away from the puck as he's trying to tie it up. To me, that's blatant inteference, but it must be seen by the Refs; it cannot be reviewed.

The kick moved Lundqvists stick which dragged the puck into the net. Pretty clearly in violation of the rule I posted last night.
 
Mike Smith vs. Pekka Rinne in the next round? Could be a goaltending battle for the ages!


I wonder what the over/under is on goals in this series. Neither team is an offensive juggernaut. :D

Now you Nashville fans are going to get the joy of 2 AM OT games. I swear the Red Wings in playoffs on the coast effected productivity for the whole area economy a couple of days latter. Lots of bleary eyed hungover fans. :hiding:
 
EricF said:
Same thing for LA vs. St. Louis. Some are predicting the first game to be a score of 0 to -1.

Hopefully with Jonathan Quick in the net the offense-skinny Kings will only need to score a goal to win, similar to what Hasek did for Czech Republic at Olympics 1000 years ago. We only have a handful of guys with double-digit goals on 2012 so we need more participation from the other kids. Unlikely heroes welcome. We hate the Blues--historically they cut the Kings in playoffs. Hate.
 
Lord, I hate TSN. Gossipy friggin crap. One breath of Luongo willing to waive his no-trade clause (which is a "story" they created in the first place) and now they're doing segments on possible teams he will be traded to. What a damn cheese-fest.
 
Florida just tied it up. Brodeur just does not look like himself.

He just looks a little lethargic. He has made decent saves, but is giving up a lot of second opportunities from a lack of puck awareness.

If the Devils can continue getting shots on goal they'll break though again. Defense just needs to hold up.

Man.. Upshall just started decking Bernier while he was on the ground after a minor scrum in front of the net.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.