• TalkBass has been independent since 1998. Add your voice.
    Create a free account to reply to discussions, view embedded media, and browse with fewer display ads.
    Join freeLog in
    Want zero display ads or expanded classifieds tools? Compare plans.

The Paracast - UFO's & Paranormal

Thir13teen

Silence = Deaf
Supporting Member
Feb 12, 2012
1,535
1,434
USA
Does anybody here listen to The Paracast? Or participate in their forums? If you are interested in UFO's and/or the paranormal, check it out The Paracast — The Gold Standard of Paranormal Radio

They truly are "The Gold Standard Of Paranormal Radio". The host is excellent. He's been doing this since the 1970s and is extremely knowledgeable and very serious. But also has a sense of humor. Come on over and say hi!
 
  • Like
Reactions: Fretless
Every once in awhile I listen to AM Coast to Coast. I love when they flip it around and say that if you were really a skeptic, you'd be skeptical of the scientists.
As though there's a worldwide "scientist conspiracy." Scientists police themselves. They love to find flaws in others' findings and theories. Such things that don't pass the scrutiny of scientists in the same field are exposed in refereed publications. For example, Pons and Fleischmann's cold fusion experiments - their research was flawed, they were exposed, and they faded into obscurity.

Probably no science is more contentious than my own field of geology. The study of how the earth works is still a young science, and new discoveries and theories are brought forward every day. Did you know that the cause of earthquakes was not known until after the San Francisco earthquake and fire of 1906? Fault mechanisms, along with plate tectonics have been studied intensely since then, and we have a deep understanding of how these things work now. However, there is still much to be learned about the underlying driving mechanism so, yes, there will be more added to the science going forward - it's a dynamic process. Nothing will be added by superstition. Superstition is static, so clinging to the ones that have not changed over thousands of years is silly.

Over time, as evidence is discovered, our knowledge is increased - there is no such thing as "perfect understanding." That's what science is about - taking the knowledge we have and refining it to move closer to perfection. Science naysayers (usually people who cling to unsubstantiated beliefs) try to use that characteristic of scientific investigation to discredit it, saying, "It changes all the time, so scientists don't really know what's going on." That is exactly the strength of science. We're not satisfied until we can get the the very bottom of what's truly behind a phenomenon.

If you want to sound really ignorant, invoke the old chestnut, "it's just a theory, not a fact." Look up the meaning of the word "theory." There are bodies of knowledge that are well-established facts (as revealed by repeated experiments, not long-held superstitions). Those bodies of knowledge are called "theories," as in the Theory of Relativity or the Theory of Evolution. Both are well-proven concepts and, as in all sciences, are growing continuously.
 
I looked up theory. It does not mean proof or fact.
Theory has two common meanings. "I have a theory about who stole the last cookie", does not have the same meaning as "the theory of gravity, or the "germ theory of disease", or the "theory of evolution". These theories aren't ideas. Scientific theory is bigger than a proof or a fact. It's a body of work. It's an explanation.

I actually don't know what you're talking about but the misunderstanding of that word is sadly common enough anyway so I figured I'd explain it.
 
Does anybody here listen to The Paracast? Or participate in their forums? If you are interested in UFO's and/or the paranormal, check it out The Paracast — The Gold Standard of Paranormal Radio

They truly are "The Gold Standard Of Paranormal Radio". The host is excellent. He's been doing this since the 1970s and is extremely knowledgeable and very serious. But also has a sense of humor. Come on over and say hi!
Wow, such disapproval!
I listen to AM Coast to Coast, there, I said it! It's entertaining! Especially when I can't sleep.
I will give Gold standard a listen. They even have archived shows.

Entertainment, much like TB. I don't believe or agree on everything I read on TB!

Btw, I like Ancient Aliens too!
image.jpg

Entertainment.
 
As though there's a worldwide "scientist conspiracy." Scientists police themselves. They love to find flaws in others' findings and theories. Such things that don't pass the scrutiny of scientists in the same field are exposed in refereed publications. For example, Pons and Fleischmann's cold fusion experiments - their research was flawed, they were exposed, and they faded into obscurity.

Probably no science is more contentious than my own field of geology. The study of how the earth works is still a young science, and new discoveries and theories are brought forward every day. Did you know that the cause of earthquakes was not known until after the San Francisco earthquake and fire of 1906? Fault mechanisms, along with plate tectonics have been studied intensely since then, and we have a deep understanding of how these things work now. However, there is still much to be learned about the underlying driving mechanism so, yes, there will be more added to the science going forward - it's a dynamic process. Nothing will be added by superstition. Superstition is static, so clinging to the ones that have not changed over thousands of years is silly.

Over time, as evidence is discovered, our knowledge is increased - there is no such thing as "perfect understanding." That's what science is about - taking the knowledge we have and refining it to move closer to perfection. Science naysayers (usually people who cling to unsubstantiated beliefs) try to use that characteristic of scientific investigation to discredit it, saying, "It changes all the time, so scientists don't really know what's going on." That is exactly the strength of science. We're not satisfied until we can get the the very bottom of what's truly behind a phenomenon.

If you want to sound really ignorant, invoke the old chestnut, "it's just a theory, not a fact." Look up the meaning of the word "theory." There are bodies of knowledge that are well-established facts (as revealed by repeated experiments, not long-held superstitions). Those bodies of knowledge are called "theories," as in the Theory of Relativity or the Theory of Evolution. Both are well-proven concepts and, as in all sciences, are growing continuously.

See, there was another example of when I wish there was sarcasm font. When I said "I love it" I didn't mean I agree with them. I meant that I think it's hilarious when the conspiracy nuts flip it around on the skeptics and claim they are the real skeptics. You have to spin a truck load of BS to get to that place.
 
  • Like
Reactions: One Drop

Latest posts