• TalkBass has been independent since 1998. Add your voice.
    Create a free account to reply to discussions, view embedded media, and browse with fewer display ads.
    Join freeLog in
    Want zero display ads or expanded classifieds tools? Compare plans.

The Sushi Box FX Secret Society

My Slampegg arrived a couple weeks ago. Great piece! Im pretty much running EQ at Noon, gain at 10 o'clock, and switches off. Enjoying the sound but wondering if anyone has settings they enjoy most? Running a p bass with flats.

What are everyones's favorite Slampegg settings? Noon seems to be a great B15 sound, does it get into other territory? Thanks!

I saw earlier someone mention that the Slampegg can “do both” the B15 and SVT sounds. Curious how I can get more svt sounds from my Slampegg. I know it’s a B15 style pedal but just didn’t know what I’m missing.

Having a tough time finding use for the switches too. Maybe that’s what I’m not getting.
 
Question:
How close is a Grand Slampegg compare to a Finally w/12AU7?

I love love love my Finally, but my guitarist has been bugging me to sell it to him. And I would like eq.
My understanding is they aren't that close. Finally was based off the UA circuit IIRC, so in the broadest of senses, we are talking about Fender v. Ampeg sound. Although, that being said, I think you are talking about different flavours of awesome, and they will both do similar things overall to your tone. These pedals may be based off classic circuits, but Nathan makes sure to give everything his own signature Sushi take, so I don't think you can go wrong with either a Finally or GS!
 
  • Like
Reactions: mikeswals
Question:
How close is a Grand Slampegg compare to a Finally w/12AU7?

I love love love my Finally, but my guitarist has been bugging me to sell it to him. And I would like eq.
In the most basic terms, from owning both I'd describe the finally as a bit more hifi/slightly more evenly voiced, the GS with the EQ pretty flat sounds a bit more "rounded" and a slightly bigger bottom end, and the the EQ can go from there.

When I'm using my finally I usually have a UA in front of it for the EQ (plus more tubes are more good right?).
If you're after a particularly modern sound then the GS may not be the one, but for most other things it's killer.
 
In the most basic terms, from owning both I'd describe the finally as a bit more hifi/slightly more evenly voiced, the GS with the EQ pretty flat sounds a bit more "rounded" and a slightly bigger bottom end, and the the EQ can go from there.

When I'm using my finally I usually have a UA in front of it for the EQ (plus more tubes are more good right?).
If you're after a particularly modern sound then the GS may not be the one, but for most other things it's killer.
Oh I thought the finally was more transparent like the More but with an xlr out, so far it is the perfect di for my nano board I’m putting together with the HX Stomp, do you think it will be just fine, I’m waiting for the finally V3 to be released and I just want some tube warm for the digital sound of the stomp.
 
Oh I thought the finally was more transparent like the More but with an xlr out, so far it is the perfect di for my nano board I’m putting together with the HX Stomp, do you think it will be just fine, I’m waiting for the finally V3 to be released and I just want some tube warm for the digital sound of the stomp.
Finally is exactly a UA without the tone stack. It can provide clean through dirty tube tones without eq.
 
Finally is exactly a UA without the tone stack. It can provide clean through dirty tube tones without eq.
Question:
How close is a Grand Slampegg compare to a Finally w/12AU7?

I love love love my Finally, but my guitarist has been bugging me to sell it to him. And I would like eq.
Can't recommend the UA enough. Helps beef up any DI you use as well, paired it with a JDI last night and loved the tone, also sounds good with the Finally, and now that the variable HPF will be included with the V3 you can really sculpt a sound between those two units. I gigged a V1 Finally and a UA for quite a while and it was great
 
  • Like
Reactions: Mighty Thumb
Oh I thought the finally was more transparent like the More but with an xlr out, so far it is the perfect di for my nano board I’m putting together with the HX Stomp, do you think it will be just fine, I’m waiting for the finally V3 to be released and I just want some tube warm for the digital sound of the stomp.
I’ve used a finally. V1 for a long while before switching over to the neptunium. I am actually using my nano+ board right now at church with the stomp and it is wonderful.
IMG_0705.jpeg
 
I’m looking for some subtle tube harmonics, while keeping the fast transient response of my ss amp. I do not need more eq. Would the finally v2 or the underground accelerator be a better choice for this? (I’m thinking the finally v2 but wanted to double check opinions).

Edit: never mind finally v2 is out of stock :-(
 
Last edited:
  • Like
Reactions: Parzival
I’m looking for some subtle tube harmonics, while keeping the fast transient response of my ss amp. I do not need more eq. Would the finally v2 or the underground accelerator be a better choice for this? (I’m thinking the finally v2 but wanted to double check opinions).

Edit: never mind finally v2 is out of stock :-(
If subtle harmonics, the Finally v2 WBIM edition as it has the 12au7 tube. UA and earlier Finally v2 and v1 have a 12ax7 tube and are a bit grittier, but can also be subtle at very low gain.
 
I’m looking for some subtle tube harmonics, while keeping the fast transient response of my ss amp. I do not need more eq. Would the finally v2 or the underground accelerator be a better choice for this? (I’m thinking the finally v2 but wanted to double check opinions).

Edit: never mind finally v2 is out of stock :-(
If you don't need any EQ, you might want to check out the MORE, or even the Single Slice, for subtle tube harmonics. MORE just makes everything sound better, and that would be my first choice. I'm digging the Single Slice as well, though, and you can a little subtle compression and presence with that one.
 
If you don't need any EQ, you might want to check out the MORE, or even the Single Slice, for subtle tube harmonics. MORE just makes everything sound better, and that would be my first choice. I'm digging the Single Slice as well, though, and you can a little subtle compression and presence with that one.
Interesting. How do you control the amount of harmonics? There’s no gain control. Do you just use a boost in front of it?
 
Interesting. How do you control the amount of harmonics? There’s no gain control. Do you just use a boost in front of it?
The single knob on the MORE is output level, and you can give the signal a boost with it, if you want to. To my ear, MORE supplies a harmonic richness that doesn't get in the way of anything else. I don't know much about how it works, but it really does do what the name says: it gives you more.
 
I’m looking for some subtle tube harmonics, while keeping the fast transient response of my ss amp. I do not need more eq. Would the finally v2 or the underground accelerator be a better choice for this? (I’m thinking the finally v2 but wanted to double check opinions).

Edit: never mind finally v2 is out of stock :-(
Will echo what everyone else said here; the UA you can certainly get subtle harmonics and bypass the EQ circuit; Finally would work great (and you get a DI) but to me MORE is the answer here. Definitely makes everything sound MORE... so to speak. Also not Sushi Box but the SIngular Audio Tubedrve is a great option for what you're looking for.
 
I’ve used a finally. V1 for a long while before switching over to the neptunium. I am actually using my nano+ board right now at church with the stomp and it is wonderful. View attachment 7135614
Great board! At the time Neptunium was available I had no direct need for one and didn’t “just get one anyway”. Now I wish I had because now I do. I’m keeping my eye out for one to pop up in the classifieds. Or, ahem, I’d buy one in a heartbeat if there was a second release! Also would like to try out the Becos comp, but need to finish doing some comparisons with current ones and then move a few along.
 
Will echo what everyone else said here; the UA you can certainly get subtle harmonics and bypass the EQ circuit; Finally would work great (and you get a DI) but to me MORE is the answer here. Definitely makes everything sound MORE... so to speak. Also not Sushi Box but the SIngular Audio Tubedrve is a great option for what you're looking for.
The singular audio demo sounds really good. I cannot find any demos of the more on YouTube though. Will keep looking.
 
  • Like
Reactions: mrperkolator