Originally posted by Bruce Lindfield
But there are loads of basses out there that sound as good as, if not better than the Thumb bass -
so why bother with all these modifications and just buy a well-balanced bass in the first place?
My overwhelming feeling is that once you get into the realms of decent basses, be they fenders, carvins, sadowskys, foderas, mtds etc (yes I know that there's a big difference in price and quality etc) the issue is not one of whether it sounds good or not - almost all 'real' basses, and many very cheap ones, have a tone that suits someone.
Whether quality bass sounds good or not is a qualitative rather than quantitative issue - if the sound you want to hear is that of a Thumb then no other bass is going to sound as good to you. If your sound is that of an 80s Tobias then to you that will be the best-sounding bass. It's all down to personal opinions.
No bass out there is the best sounding bass for everyone, and if to get the tone you want requires a Thumb bass (and they are very distinctive sounding) then you'll have to suffer neck-dive or modify the bass. (However saying that, I'm sure a custom Streamer or Corvette with the same body and neck woods and same pickup positioning as a Thumb would get very close to that tone).
Alex
P.S. When I got my old Streamer I'd previously been playing a Hohner headless thing, and I was convinced the Warwick (and every other non-headless bass out there) suffered from neck dive. It doesn't, it's just that the Hohner likes to reside at a very comfy 60 deg. angle.
P.P.S. If you want the original Warwick sound (that of Wenge necks, Rosewood bodies, and EMG pickups)and don't like neck-dive there's always the Nobby Meidel...
P.P.P.S. And the early basses have much slimmer necks front-to-back