Depends. If you're more of a player, I'd stop thinking about what to buy next. Pick out two basses that compliment each other, sell or stash the others, and see how you feel about it after a month or so of only having a few basses to play. If you're more of a builder/tinkerer/collector, sell everything except your #1 and see where your interests take you!
Enjoy the benefits of a premium membership!
Upgrade Account
-
TalkBass has been independent since 1998. Add your voice.
Create a free account to reply to discussions, view embedded media, and browse with fewer display ads.
Join free Log in
Want zero display ads or expanded classifieds tools? Compare plans.
Thinking about downsizing…seeking advice
- Thread starter eastcoasteddie
- Start date
Do you not like the fretless J?
If it were me, There’s a good chance I would just sell the Fretted J and be done with it.
If I didn’t like that fretted J, I’d sell it off, and start a fund with that cash. Then go browsing, and only replace the fretless J when I found something I liked better (whatever that may be.) The sell the fretless J and recoup expenses.
If it were me, There’s a good chance I would just sell the Fretted J and be done with it.
If I didn’t like that fretted J, I’d sell it off, and start a fund with that cash. Then go browsing, and only replace the fretless J when I found something I liked better (whatever that may be.) The sell the fretless J and recoup expenses.
Keep the twins and buy the fretless twin to your G&L and then get a pair of sting rays and you will have the Leo Fender twins covered.
You know what you want/need to do. Asking us isn't the answer.
One of my first "good" basses was a 90's G&L L2500. Keep it.
I like the idea of "twins" as well. I had a fretless to go with my main fretted for a long time. I wish I still had it.
I would sell everything and get a G&L L2500 fretless to go with your fretted. I think that is an ideal pairing. Your G&L can get the MM thing with the bridge pickup solo'd.
The extreme would be sell it all but keep your G&L L2500.
I like the idea of "twins" as well. I had a fretless to go with my main fretted for a long time. I wish I still had it.
I would sell everything and get a G&L L2500 fretless to go with your fretted. I think that is an ideal pairing. Your G&L can get the MM thing with the bridge pickup solo'd.
The extreme would be sell it all but keep your G&L L2500.
I have been trying to downsize for last year or so,down from 6 to 2 now. I had the twin to your L2500 blue burst L2000, had rosewood fretboard with the ghost fret lines, with the maple body binding. Really regret letting that one go! I am down to 1998 Music Man Stingray,and 2004 Lakland Skyline 44-02. I only play at Church three times a week. I am trying to decide to let one of them go,and be down to one.
The fretless twin to your lifetime axe seems most logical, to me, for you.
But 1) I am not you and 2) neither of us are Vulcan.
Just to complicate it for you, I will say that my “lifetime” pickup configuration is J/J with single coils.
But 1) I am not you and 2) neither of us are Vulcan.
Just to complicate it for you, I will say that my “lifetime” pickup configuration is J/J with single coils.
You've already decided that you're going to keep your #1 no matter what - - and that puts you ahead of many of the people here who keep looking for the pot of gold at the end of the rainbow!
I think that's great - and let's face it, an L-2500 is a helluva good bass.
My vote is to sell the parts basses off - no matter what else you do. If you think you'd like to have a fretless and will use it enough to support having it, then by all means get another fretless G&L. The only downside to doing that is that having radically different basses could theoretically produce different sounds; however, you already know that the L-2500 has a very wide sound palette thanks to the controls and those beefy MFD pickups.
I think that's great - and let's face it, an L-2500 is a helluva good bass.
My vote is to sell the parts basses off - no matter what else you do. If you think you'd like to have a fretless and will use it enough to support having it, then by all means get another fretless G&L. The only downside to doing that is that having radically different basses could theoretically produce different sounds; however, you already know that the L-2500 has a very wide sound palette thanks to the controls and those beefy MFD pickups.
Because they seem to be Hella-expensive these days…even used ones 25 years old…their market has somewhat exploded recently.
It is possible I would keep the Fretless J, since I don’t use Fretless all that much…it might be more of a novelty at this point. I may not want to spend big money on another one…
I may just sell the fretted J (even though that neck is so sweet), and either go for a Kilo 5 or build the Warmoth SR5-thing I’ve been thinking of…
+1. He's already there.Many of us would say that you’re already downsized with only 3 basses.
For the parts basses: sell one of the bodies. You can swap necks on the remaining body as desired.
Gaolee
Official leathers tester and crash dummy
That's more like it. This is TalkBass. All this advice about selling bass guitars is just wrong. Keep 'em all and buy three more. Then post pictures.Fire the drummer and buy two more basses!
You know…I was thinking the exact same thing…+1. He's already there.
For the parts basses: sell one of the bodies. You can swap necks on the remaining body as desired.
I have the Squier neck that originally came on the body that is now the Fretless.
I will put that one on the CV Body (fretted) and sell it as a Squier with upgraded pickups and preamp.
Keep the Warmoth fretted neck to swap between fretted/Fretless if I desire…and ai get to keep that sweet-@$$ed neck…
Keep all your basses and place them in strategic places so you will pick them up faster when you can and if you want to buy a 2nd G&L fretless then do so anyway.... you say you can't justify it.... but think about who you have to justify this to, at least not me.
As long as you don't get into financial trouble and have to eat one less slice of bread.
Since you like the idea of fraternal twins and having a fretless as the twin, it sounds like an easy decision to me - get a similar fretless blueburst and bound L-2500.
FWIW, I recently bought a fraternal twin (2019 Stingray Special 5 HH) to my long time #1 bass (2007 ceramic Stingray 5 HH). They feel nearly identical to me but they differ enough in sound to be worth it to me to have both. I'm SO happy with these two that I have to make a conscious decision to play one of my other basses, including my old #2, a G&L L-2500. Everytime I play the L-2500 at a gig or in my basement jam, I'm reminded of just how good a bass it is. I honestly love it, but my twins work that much better for me. So, based on that, I suggested going with the twins.
Good luck no matter which way you go. Doesn't sound like you can make a wrong decision out of those options.
FWIW, I recently bought a fraternal twin (2019 Stingray Special 5 HH) to my long time #1 bass (2007 ceramic Stingray 5 HH). They feel nearly identical to me but they differ enough in sound to be worth it to me to have both. I'm SO happy with these two that I have to make a conscious decision to play one of my other basses, including my old #2, a G&L L-2500. Everytime I play the L-2500 at a gig or in my basement jam, I'm reminded of just how good a bass it is. I honestly love it, but my twins work that much better for me. So, based on that, I suggested going with the twins.
Good luck no matter which way you go. Doesn't sound like you can make a wrong decision out of those options.
I too am downsizing as far as I can possibly go.
I'd be content with only owning the Ernie Ball Music Man Sterling 4 HH bass.
It checks all my boxes;
I'd be content with only owning the Ernie Ball Music Man Sterling 4 HH bass.
It checks all my boxes;
