• TalkBass has been independent since 1998. Add your voice.
    Create a free account to reply to discussions, view embedded media, and browse with fewer display ads.
    Join freeLog in
    Want zero display ads or expanded classifieds tools? Compare plans.

Thoughts on the Shure PGX and SLX wireless mics

I purchased a Shure PGX SM58 ($400) a couple years back. Bought it for some DJ and wedding services, and it was fine for announcements and DJ use. I later gave it to the lead singer to try, and our soundman said it didn't sound as good/open/airy as even a regular wired SM58. Made me wish I spent the extra $50 and got the Beta 58 version of the PGX. I ended up selling it.

He has since been using a Beta87A as his primary vocal mic and we really like it. He wants to go wireless again, but my experience tells me that he needs to at least try the PGX beta 58, or possibly the SLX beta87. The SLX beta87 is over $750. I can't find many reviews comparing it to the wired counterpart, so I'm coming here asking for your opinions on these two mics, expecially compared to the wired versions. Those same mic elements are used on multiple wireless product lines, so I assume that the real money is being spent in the wireless technologies, and you get what you pay for? I could use some real world experiences.
Thanks!
Wes
 
I had great results using a SLX Beta58 wireless, IMO it sounded just as good as the wired version.
Check with RMC audio for pricing, they were about the cheapest around when I had bought mine a few years back.
Before you lay out your cash, no one, not even RMC, will come close to Link Removed price on Shure. You have to call them on the phone to get the price. I think the new Shure PGXD digital system would be worth considering. The Beta 58A capsule should sound pretty decent.