• TalkBass has been independent since 1998. Add your voice.
    Create a free account to reply to discussions, view embedded media, and browse with fewer display ads.
    Join freeLog in
    Want zero display ads or expanded classifieds tools? Compare plans.

Thunderbird Club

Looks like a great time!
BTW - I’d bet that nearly zero percent of the 30 something and under crowd has any clue that your band logo incorporates a 45RPM record adapter to be used on LP turntables.


The Goth is an incredibly under rated bass. I have four of them (two active and two passive). At the $400 and under used price point they are a fantastic modding platform. For a real treat and dirt cheap mod try removing the .687uf tone cap and replacing it with a .022 tone cap - it’ll bring down the house! That and a set of Ernie Ball Cobalt Flat strings and you’ll own the stage.


Not cheeky at all, if I decide to off the Goth pickguard it’s yours.
...used to be - closer to double that now
 
I completely agree, but seems I recall something about some in 1965. But...
1) it was the internet, I believe (most likely the issue)
2) we're talking Gibson and their numbers (like my white 1976 Thunderbird which is an oddity)
We won't even get into the possibility of me misremembering!
I recall having that information pre-internet -
 
Zero doubled is still zero ;)
Seriously, I’d be shocked if any 30 and under person on a college campus had a clue what that adapter was made for.
I think the double comment referenced Goth prices.

As for the adapter, I know several young people who know. Some own one along with 45s.

Alas, all my 45s are long gone. I think we have one or two kid 45s…
 
Digging around a little I find that the Non Reverse Firebird was debuted at the Summer 1965 NAMM show, and Gruhn's does list Thunderbirds as being produced from '65-'69.

This is from Fly Guitars.

"In May 1965 Gibson stopped producing the older reverse body Thunderbird and redesigned the instrument for a 1966 launch. Whether any were actually available in 1965 is unclear, however price lists were heralding the new instrument as early as June 1965. Interestingly enough the Thunderbirds were not as expensive as the much smaller EB basses. The Thunderbird IV was priced at $289.50 compared with $337.50 for an EB3, whilst the II was $239.50 - just 50 cents less than the $240 EB0.

The major difference to the 1963 Thunderbird was of course the reverse body style, but also the neck was now the typical glued in 'set neck' that appeared on all other Gibsons of the period. The new set neck meant the body was one flat slab, without the raised central portion. This allowed an unusual scratchplate that covered a lot more of the guitar body. The hardware and pickups remained unchanged, though the nickel plated covers were all switched to chrome."

The quote below is from "Vintage Guitar" magazine.

"Another concern came from Fender itself, which made noise about a lawsuit claiming the body shape encroached on Leo’s patented “offset waist” design. A letter dated February 7, 1964, shows Fender’s patent attorneys prodding Leo to file suit against Gibson: “…the question of Gibson’s Firebird models should be reconsidered. When the Gibson catalog pages are held up to the light and looked at from the reverse side, the outline is very similar to a Fender outline. I am sure you are aware of this but I felt I should write this letter to remind us that the question should be reconsidered at a later date.

”This was CC’d to Fender sales head Don Randall, and while it sounds like lawyers trying todrum up business, it resulted in discussions with Gibson.
McCarty, though, was dismissive.

“Leo always wanted to sue somebody… so Fender got their attorneys and we had a meeting… there were engineers and attorneys,” McCarty said in Gil Hembree’s Gibson Guitars: Ted McCarty’s Golden Era 1948-1966. “Our presentation ended the discussion about a lawsuit.”"



JQLEkkg.jpg
 
Six days and my to-be ThunderPbass is still sitting in the same location <20 mins away in town....

I feel your pain, those model train cars of mine were 29 days in transit from Pennsylvania to Seattle, They took a trip on the barge to Alaska for more than two weeks.
 
I completely agree, but seems I recall something about some in 1965. But...
1) it was the internet, I believe (most likely the issue)
2) we're talking Gibson and their numbers (like my white 1976 Thunderbird which is an oddity)
We won't even get into the possibility of me misremembering!
My EB-2 has a serial number that makes no sense. I do not know when it was really built.