WOW!!! Yeah... a job like that definitely demands sharp instincts an a significant amount of testicular fortitude! That also helps explain how you're able to separate your inner musician/artist from your business/analitical mind, and objectively view the situation. I don't think we've blatantly disagreed on any of the various points that have been made. It's just that you've viewed it from a business perspective, and I've viewed it from a more emotionally charged consumer's perspective. I would imagine that the two of us together could run one helluva biznissI'm not trying to justify Henry J's behaviour.
I don't disagree that a good company needs to make product/service at a quality level and price point that the target market wants. And that it should do the work required to understand its target customers and provide them with product and service commensurate with expectations.
What I am trying to do is present some of my analysis Henry J's history and behaviours and what that reveals about what he is trying to do with Gibson and the likely outcomes. I spent over a decade as a research analyst at investment banks - those are the guys that write the reports telling you what stocks to buy/sell. To be successful in that, you have to have a knack for reading the tea leaves to see where a company is going then have the foresight to see how it will all play out in the industry. That is what I have done with Gibson and I think that you will see the company bought by a Japanese instrument maker and Yamaha tops my list. FWIW, I think that Gibson as a Yamaha company would produce outstanding instruments and could regain the esteemed position that it used to have.
