• TalkBass has been independent since 1998. Add your voice.
    Create a free account to reply to discussions, view embedded media, and browse with fewer display ads.
    Join freeLog in
    Want zero display ads or expanded classifieds tools? Compare plans.

Thunderbird Club

On my VP going from RS66 to Cobalt or Fender flats means a truss rod adjustment. It’s normal and not a big deal - that why there is an adjustable truss rod.
From what I’ve gathered, the LTFs are actually lower tension than a RS66 45-105. I may try the extra light set of DTFs.
I haven't seen the tension numbers, but would say you are correct on the lower tension--but not drastically so. It's not like going from a Med something to TIs, which would be another matter.
 
I haven't seen the tension numbers, but would say you are correct on the lower tension--but not drastically so. It's not like going from a Med something to TIs, which would be another matter.
I note that many people confuse tension and stiffness.

Tension = pulling force end to end
Stiffness = resistance to lateral deformation

Higher stiffness can feel like higher tension, but is not necessarily so.
 
I note that many people confuse tension and stiffness.

Tension = pulling force end to end
Stiffness = resistance to lateral deformation

Higher stiffness can feel like higher tension, but is not necessarily so.
Correct you are. That seems to get lost sometimes in the string section discussions.
 
I can't seem to find a direct comparison of the Epiphone Thunderbird Classic Pro and the Epiphone Thunderbird Vintage Pro. Can someone tell me more about the two? What do you think about them?

from what I gather:

classic pro is like a modern (90s on) T’bird
Vintage pro is like a 60s T’bird

I’m sure others will jump aboard doon
 
Hey @GonePlaid, my order you suggested came today. They look pretty cool.
D0C2BF6C-B8D0-4EFD-9775-CE25CD02CF00.jpeg
 
Last edited:
View attachment 3648739 I seriously doubt that the LTF's tension would be higher than the RS66's. In fact, I'd be willing to bet that the tension would be lower. While they aren't as 'noodly" feeling as TI Jazz Flats, at 136 lbs total tension, the LTFs actually have about 6 lbs. less tension than the TIs do. I have them on this '73 4001 for that very reason; the Rick is starting to develop the Negative Neck Angle problem that plagues these old 4001's. So, the lower the tension, the better. But, they do sound very good on the old thing; and fer sure don't feel like low tension strings... But, the only way to know for sure if you could swap strings with out a truss rod adjustment, would be to try it, and see...:cool:
Yeah it would be easier if Rotosound would publish the tension specs.
 
from what I gather:

classic pro is like a modern (90s on) T’bird
Vintage pro is like a 60s T’bird

I’m sure others will jump aboard doon
As stated ^
Classic Pro has the 3 point bridge, black hardware and smaller peghead with Y tuners.
Vintage Pro has a tunomatic bridge, Chrome and a huge peghead with clover tuners
 
from what I gather:

classic pro is like a modern (90s on) T’bird
Vintage pro is like a 60s T’bird

I’m sure others will jump aboard doon

That's interesting. Thanks.

As stated ^
Classic Pro has the 3 point bridge, black hardware and smaller peghead with Y tuners.
Vintage Pro has a tunomatic bridge, Chrome and a huge peghead with clover tuners

I have no idea what this all means, but thanks. I'm new to bass guitars and I'm in the middle of researching all the information.

I'm a bit ashamed to admit this, but I actually asked my question with a motive to fish out any negative responses for those particular models.

And this is why I don't go into GP much. A Thunderbird, Warwick, or Ric isn't good for slapping because he's never seen anyone do it. Solid argument.

Need bass guitar recommendations (All details inside)

My thread lol.

Those statements really threw me off because I REALLY liked how those basses sound when slapped.