• TalkBass has been independent since 1998. Add your voice.
    Create a free account to reply to discussions, view embedded media, and browse with fewer display ads.
    Join freeLog in
    Want zero display ads or expanded classifieds tools? Compare plans.

Thunderbird Club

I would think long and hard before parting with a good one of those. They were well made, although when I looked for one, the fretwork and an unusable J pickup kept me from ever buying one. It may be the best Squire bass ever made (full disclosure, I’m not much of a Squire fan). I guess what I’m suggesting is that you may not get enough for it to account for the real value of it to you. They’re discontinued now and I think in a few years you’ll see average selling prices of $300+ for one.
The good thing is that I don't hafta sell it. And I won't take a bath on it. It has a coupla mods-ashtray, custom thumb rest, strings, and a [generic] case. I know what I have in it, so lowball offers will be rudely ignored.
 
The good thing is that I don't hafta sell it. And I won't take a bath on it. It has a coupla mods-ashtray, custom thumb rest, strings, and a [generic] case. I know what I have in it, so lowball offers will be rudely ignored.

As they should be. I owned a MII Squier Jazz that I paid $75 for used. I upgraded a couple things and made it a decent bass. Sold it later for about what I put into it so now someone else is happy.
 
How do you like Pure Blues on the `bird? I like them on my JC, but have yet to try them on a bird.
I haven't got to use them out yet. Next Sunday, most likely. At home they are not as bright as one would think. Surprising to me. They seem to be pretty full in the low mids, but seem to lack the mid-mids to upper mids like say Rotos. Compared to Boomers they seem a little less aggressive. I'll try to give my impressions after next weekend. Feel free to ask/remind if I forget.

The JC is not what you would expect. It has far more growl than you would think a semi-hollow should have. It is a solid addition to the stable.
Not helping.....:rollno: Honestly I really would like one. Too many good options these days. They seem like they would be uncomfortable to play and would have some neck dive.
 
LOL - that's the truth.
You could have a hundred people in a bar grooving to your band and I bet fewer than 5 even bother to look at the logo on your headstock. Four of those five are in your band and know exactly what bass you're rockin. The fifth guy is a bass player from another band out in the audience getting a chuckle and trying to impress his girlfriend with his knowledge of your bass, she just tells him to quit being such a nerd, shut up and enjoy the music.

As long as you don't try to market it as something it's not then I say, whatever floats your boat.
Try out playing a fretless Thunderbird. There is always one really weird guy who stares at it all night trying to figure out what it is. And unfortunately, he does not have a girlfriend to tell him to cut it out! But who cares. A fretless 'Bird is its own form of outstanding and worth any odd people.
 
But if I bought one that had already had the Gibson TRC put on it I wouldn’t bother paying to put an Epi one back on it. If the Epi TRC came in the deal I probably (possibly?) would change it back to Epiphone.
My Epi IV had a Gibson trc when I bought it, but it was crap, and the thin one-layer, with only 2 screws holding it in poorly drilled holes. So it got replaced :smug:
20200129_215807.jpg
20200129_215831.jpg
20200129_220424.jpg

(I did add the third screw later...)
 
Try out playing a fretless Thunderbird. There is always one really weird guy who stares at it all night trying to figure out what it is. And unfortunately, he does not have a girlfriend to tell him to cut it out! But who cares. A fretless 'Bird is its own form of outstanding and worth any odd people.

That is a rare bird indeed.
 
!!! Now that I know this, I'll be more likely to laugh when I see someone who would spend that kind of money on a small piece of plastic to "look cooler". I've said it before - why would anyone want to give Gibson credit for what they never could be bothered to do? Fly that Epiphone tr cover proudly! :bassist:

Brand snobbery / insecurity, plain and simple.
 
As a long standing cyclist - I've gone through the whole gamut of how I 'dressed' when riding. First off it was generic (vanilla) kit, then top bicycle brand/Euro pro team kit, then local club/team/district champion jersey kit, and now post-club/team/racing generic (tasteful) kit. As in, my intent is not to impress anyone with my presence on the road. With (road) cycling, it's something I enjoy doing and I know how I feel comfortable dressing for the endeavorer. Been there - done that with all the options - I dress with equal measures of (understated) style and function. (no neon - so '80s)

I bring this up with regard to 'labels' like Gibson/Epiphone. For me, at one time 'posing' seemed important as a cyclist. (whether I thought of it like that or not) In retrospect it was part of a misconstrued attempt at establishing myself as a serious cyclist. The Gibson/Epiphone thing (considering the fine Epi VP T-bird) is along those same lines. I realized those who "rated" my presence on the road as a serious cyclist were assessing how I rode - not what I rode or how I was dressed. I do the same because I don't want someone who doesn't have experience to compromise my ride. (a specific safety consideration, especially in a group ride)

As has been pointed out here - only geeky insiders follow this ... everyone's got their own level of detail wants and needs - but it all comes down to what is done with the bass right? (the extraneous details are extremely personal)
 
Last edited:
First time TBC poser, I mean poster..

..here to gawk mostly but thought I would say hello and stuff.

Gidday!

Almost 6 months back I purchased a Gibson T-bird IV, always loved the shapes, Love ebony fingerboards and fell in love with thIs natural burst finish. I didn’t love the bridge, now sporting a full contact Babicz. There was a small crack in the pickguard (The pointy bit) so I looked for a replacement and discovered some custom leather numbers but for the prices I decided I’d buy some tools and make my own....


81089B0D-36CE-468A-9B1B-5129C64C1D60.jpeg 4F1E1865-E9C0-4870-93B0-E80214EFDD42.jpeg
Very happy with the look and feel of this thing. Hope I’m in the right place, carry on please.
~Richo
 
First time TBC poser, I mean poster..

..here to gawk mostly but thought I would say hello and stuff.

Gidday!

Almost 6 months back I purchased a Gibson T-bird IV, always loved the shapes, Love ebony fingerboards and fell in love with thIs natural burst finish. I didn’t love the bridge, now sporting a full contact Babicz. There was a small crack in the pickguard (The pointy bit) so I looked for a replacement and discovered some custom leather numbers but for the prices I decided I’d buy some tools and make my own....


View attachment 3929567 View attachment 3929575
Very happy with the look and feel of this thing. Hope I’m in the right place, carry on please.
~Richo

Nice work on the pg tooling :thumbsup: - very unique look for a T-bird!
 
As a long standing cyclist - I've gone through the whole gamut of how I 'dressed' when riding. First off it was generic (vanilla) kit, then top bicycle brand/Euro pro team kit, then local club/team/district champion jersey kit, and now post-club/team/racing generic (tasteful) kit. As in, my intent is not to impress anyone with my presence on the road. With (road) cycling, it's something I enjoy doing and I know how I feel comfortable dressing for the endeavorer. Been there - done that with all the options - I dress with equal measures of (understated) style and function. (no neon - so '80s)

I bring this up with regard to 'labels' like Gibson/Epiphone. For me, at one time 'posing' seemed important as a cyclist. (whether I thought of it like that or not) In retrospect it was part of a misconstrued attempt at establishing myself as a serious cyclist. The Gibson/Epiphone thing (considering the fine Epi VP T-bird) is along those same lines. I realized those who "rated" my presence on the road as a serious cyclist were assessing how I rode - not what I rode or how I was dressed. I do the same because I don't want someone who doesn't have experience to compromise my ride. (a specific safety consideration, especially in a group ride)

As has been pointed out here - only geeky insiders follow this ... everyone's got their own level of detail wants and needs - but it all comes down to what is done with the bass right? (the extraneous details are extremely personal)
We've all been there at some point for some extent of time I would think. I never wore crazy close when playing out, but I did have long hair. Now apparently I have stressed of those follicles on top a bit too much and they have given up. It's curious how this is worked out even with big-name musicians these days. In the 60s - and beyond, many wore stage outfits of some kind or another. Clearly not what they were around the house. Yet when you see many of them perform today, they look like they just walked out of the house to feed the birds. No coordination with other bandmembers, no discussions with a designer. As if to say: "Just give me a shirt or T-shirt and some jeans and I'm good to go." There are obviously exceptions. Steven Tyler probably looks like a mentally disturbed gypsy no matter where he goes. Some people just want the look, no doubt in part to be noticed. No judgment either way from me. Just an observation.
 
Last edited: