• TalkBass has been independent since 1998. Add your voice.
    Create a free account to reply to discussions, view embedded media, and browse with fewer display ads.
    Join freeLog in
    Want zero display ads or expanded classifieds tools? Compare plans.

TI Jazz rounds

mdogs

Supporting Member
Apr 13, 2010
5,074
11,534
Where would you like me to be?
So, I really like these strings, but the .089 E string isn’t working too well for me in my main band as we tune a 1/2 step down. I know I should theoretically be able to overcome this through the setup, but I am really struggling with getting it to where it works. Normally, I would move the strings I have to another bass to see if that makes a difference, but the bass they are on has a reverse Fender headstock and the strings were cut for that bass. So what I am wondering is, has anyone tried using the extra long set on a 34” scale bass. I’m thinking the .100 E string in that set would work very well, but I am worried about wrapping the fat part of the string on the post. I don’t have a problem spending the money on the strings, but I don’t want to waste it either if the longer string won’t work. Thoughts?
 
the bass they are on has a reverse Fender headstock and the strings were cut for that bass. So what I am wondering is, has anyone tried using the extra long set on a 34” scale bass. I’m thinking the .100 E string in that set would work very well, but I am worried about wrapping the fat part of the string on the post.

Extra winding length on the E string shouldn't be a problem on a reverse Fender headstock as the E tuner post is the farthest up from the nut.
 
I guess I was not that clear, the TI’s are already on the reverse headstock, I would be putting the new ones on a normal headstock.

I see... Sorry I misread your question.

The only thing about TI strings is there is a full 2.75" difference in winding length (ball end to silk) between "long scale" (37") and "super long scale" (39.75"). That's a lot of the full winding wrapping around the tuner post.

Since I don't have personal experience with these strings, I won't be able to comment on whether the extra length will cause any issues.
 
  • Like
Reactions: mdogs
I see... Sorry I misread your question.

The only thing about TI strings is there is a full 2.75" difference in winding length (ball end to silk) between "long scale" (37") and "super long scale" (39.75"). That's a lot of the full winding wrapping around the tuner post.

Since I don't have personal experience with these strings, I won't be able to comment on whether the extra length will cause any issues.

Ya, that is a lot of full winding on the post.
 
...has anyone tried using the extra long set on a 34” scale bass
Yes.
Immediately after receiving my Ric (33.25" scale length) I installed TIJR 36" scale and they lived on there happily for two years. I did that because at that time I thought I needed the heavier gauges. They were still good, nothing wrong, when I removed them to test another brand of string of similar type (pure nickel outer, very flexible).

This isn't necessary, I'm just telling you what I did:
That was my first set of round core strings and I was careful due to what I had read about needing to crimp the end or whatever, so I went to an extreme: (I cut at least one but can't remember if I cut more than one.) I folded, with pliers, about 1/2" the end all the way over, then instead of sticking that down into the hole in the tuner (because it wouldn't fit I think), I just laid it across the slot, so that it stuck out about 3/8", then the first turn around the post went *over* that (to hold it down), the rest of the turns going under it as usual. Worked perfectly.

EDIT: Of course I cut so as to have just one layer of windings, so I must have cut all of them.
 
Last edited:
So, I really like these strings, but the .089 E string isn’t working too well for me in my main band as we tune a 1/2 step down. I know I should theoretically be able to overcome this through the setup, but I am really struggling with getting it to where it works. .....Thoughts?

.089 is darn small for an E sting, especially when it's round wounds. What you have is a string that, when down tuned, has too little tension. I do a lot of setups, and there is no step in a setup where you have the opportunity to fix that issue. You need a bigger E string.
 
.089 is darn small for an E sting, especially when it's round wounds. What you have is a string that, when down tuned, has too little tension. I do a lot of setups, and there is no step in a setup where you have the opportunity to fix that issue. You need a bigger E string.

Well, since that is the only size E strings come in in this scale, that is a problem.
 
Ok, it isn't "multiple turns" at full thickness, but it does transition to full thickness before leaving the tuner. This is a SS Lo-Riders 95 E.

[The string behind it is a roto. This is a Squier CV '51.]
IMG-0191.jpg


BUT,
what I did on the Ric doesn't apply as well as I thought to this case because the Ric's E tuner is a lot farther from the nut. I apologize for that.
On the 33.25" scale Ric, the 36" scale TIJR E string just barely touched the metal of the post. It did not go around.
 
Last edited:
  • Like
Reactions: mikewalker
@mdogs, if it will make any difference to you I'll mount my used 36" E onto a standard 34" Fender E post and tune it up.
Even if it accepts this it would not guarantee that its life wouldn't be affected.

Info: The Dogal Hellborg rounds E is a .102. That's what's on my Ric now. (Pure nickel outer, no intermediate winding, stranded core. More flexible than TIJRs, but the E and A, especially the E, are rough.)
 
Last edited:
I have used the JR364 (extra long 36") on a regular Jazz bass with no problem at all. Assuming your tuning posts are standard Fender-type ones, not skinny like Hofner ones, there is no problem at all winding the extra length around them. The feel/stiffness is like that of a regular light gauge roundwound, not super-floppy, but still with the suppleness and gorgeously mellow musical tones of the TIJRs.
 

Latest posts