it's pretty insecure for a major player to worry about the "secrets" of his tone.....plueeeze.
+1
Especially when the tone in question isn't even that great!
TalkBass has been independent since 1998. Add your voice.
Create a free account to reply to discussions, view embedded media, and browse with fewer display ads.
Join free Log in
Want zero display ads or expanded classifieds tools? Compare plans.
it's pretty insecure for a major player to worry about the "secrets" of his tone.....plueeeze.
I love his playing, but I agree it's pretty insecure for a major player to worry about the "secrets" of his tone.....plueeeze.
Tim endorses Ernie Ball super slinkies. So much for 'no endorsements'. He's also verbally given oral sex to Fender on a number of ocassions on their site which is as good as an endorsement.
He does have an original tone, though. He also can lay down some killer pocket and he can lay down some great solos and fills.
Insecure? He probably just doesn't want a load of douche bags copying him, I think he'd be much happier if people stopped trying to work it out and went looking for some sounds of their own. Plus you don't wanna make anything easy for some lame tribute band.
I'd never try emulate his sound, it's not that great overall, but he is for all intensive purposes in a rap band, so it's good for it to have that raw and slightly boomy and wooly sound he often has. Hid distinctive tones work really well for Rage, but I can't think of anywhere else they'd sound good.
.
(plus BBC decided not to release any footage of them at Leeds Fest despite them being the headlining band for Saturday, which is really annoying)
AFAIK, they've refused permission to be filmed at every UK appearance they've made this year. Typical rock star nonsense. So much for being a band of the people, eh? If they really were, they'd have allowed their performance to be filmed and broadcast for those fans who didn't get to see them live.
They went right down in my estimation with all that rubbish.

AFAIK, they've refused permission to be filmed at every UK appearance they've made this year. Typical rock star nonsense. So much for being a band of the people, eh? If they really were, they'd have allowed their performance to be filmed and broadcast for those fans who didn't get to see them live.
They went right down in my estimation with all that rubbish.
Not to stray to far into the land of political weirdness...but it reminds me of when I see these semi-militant folks with Che' Guevara t-shirts and caps on.....I just can't help but point out that buying those items are helping make some capitalist wealthy.
I just love the deer in headlights look.![]()
AFAIK, they've refused permission to be filmed at every UK appearance they've made this year. Typical rock star nonsense. So much for being a band of the people, eh? If they really were, they'd have allowed their performance to be filmed and broadcast for those fans who didn't get to see them live.
They went right down in my estimation with all that rubbish.
All I know is that he uses an Aphex Punch Factory Compressor, and that he used TWO Dunlop 105Q Bass Wahs in Audioslave. What's the point of that?
BBC are non-commercial, but they would have in all likelihood edited the performance a fair amount, so them not allowing it to be used makes sense.
I doubt RATM are as stupid as to give ultimatums like "you broadcast our whole show, or you get nothing", but you never know. I don't think the BBC have "edited" performances, more selected certain songs or sections of the set to broadcast. But if its ok for a band like Metallica, I don't see what the big deal is.
And RATM didn't allow their performance at Glastonbury to be broadcast either...
If it weren't for the capitalist system they would have just a tiny bit of trouble doing...well...anything. (for example, booking shows, going into a studio to record, selling CD's, buying equipment, etc)
With that said, I think that their music is not so much about anti-capitalism as it is about questioning a corrupt establishment (whichever establishment that may be).
I doubt RATM are as stupid as to give ultimatums like "you broadcast our whole show, or you get nothing", but you never know. I don't think the BBC have "edited" performances, more selected certain songs or sections of the set to broadcast. But if its ok for a band like Metallica, I don't see what the big deal is.
And RATM didn't allow their performance at Glastonbury to be broadcast either...