• TalkBass has been independent since 1998. Add your voice.
    Create a free account to reply to discussions, view embedded media, and browse with fewer display ads.
    Join freeLog in
    Want zero display ads or expanded classifieds tools? Compare plans.

Tone or Style?

Tone or Style?


  • Total voters
    74
which is more important? is there a difference?

i have been grappling with this question since i first started playing music. is the word "tone" what we use when we really want to describe a player's "style"? interested in others thoughts since i never really cared too much about "tone" when i played guitar. i just tried to get things sounding "like they should" and then worked on how i played the instrument. but when i started really getting into bass this word tone is thrown around here like there's no tomorrow. i feel like i'm actually just working on how i play the bass and technique and the "tone" finds itself. or really, i just know when it sounds like crap to me and i need to change something. anyone feelin me on this??
 
  • Like
Reactions: Bassaga and KaraQ
ed-PBT-Keycaps-For-Mechanical-Keyboard-OEM-R1-Height-Arrow-Direction-Carrot-Key-Caps.jpg_960x960.jpg
 
I've always seen them as two distinctly different things If I had to choose which was more important it would have to be style. Tone can be changed with a twist of a knob or swapping out a bass. Its also ultimately much more in the hands of whoever is doing the mixing, whether it be live or in the studio, than in our own.

As far as them being 2 separate things, the 3 first bassists that came to mind were Jaco, Jamerson, and Flea. They all have very different styles, AND tones. Could you imagine Jaco or Flea playing with Jamerson's tone, or imagine what Motown would sound like on a nasaly, trebly Jazz bass? I think style and tone lend themselves to each other, but are two entirely different things.
 
Yeah, @Joe Nerve . I changed my vote. If I'm the one playing I am a total A-hole to myself in my head, scrutinizing even the most mundane things. But If I am enjoying music as a listener I can't say I even notice the tone unless it is remarkable either in a good or bad extreme. In a greater sense style and tone are related and they are both relevant to the music, the application. I appreciate the style as a listener maybe a little more than the tone.
 
  • Like
Reactions: ELG60 and Joe Nerve
Tone can be changed with a twist of a knob or swapping out a bass. Its also ultimately much more in the hands of whoever is doing the mixing, whether it be live or in the studio, than in our own.

This times a million. Good technique is required, but beyond that, tone matters only to the extent that you deliver a usable signal to the mix desk.

Assuming the cat at the board is competent and the audience can hear you, it's your style that they hear and remember. This is also why pros sound good on whatever POS instrument they pick up.

I feel like obsession with tonal nuance (and neck profiles) is in the realm of hobbyists (not that there's anything wrong with that). I definitely hone tone production with my fingers, but I don't eff with nobs and pedals and amps and cabs beyond what's required to get my signal to FOH, DI straight off the instrument whenever possible.
 
Tone is essentially the voice of the bass/bassist. Style is essentially what and how the bassist uses their voice. Style is definitely more important thought. To continue on the analogy someone could have a great voice for commentating sports but if they have the vocabulary and grammar of a five year old they will still sound like a five year old.
 
which is more important? is there a difference?

i have been grappling with this question since i first started playing music. is the word "tone" what we use when we really want to describe a player's "style"? interested in others thoughts since i never really cared too much about "tone" when i played guitar. i just tried to get things sounding "like they should" and then worked on how i played the instrument. but when i started really getting into bass this word tone is thrown around here like there's no tomorrow. i feel like i'm actually just working on how i play the bass and technique and the "tone" finds itself. or really, i just know when it sounds like crap to me and i need to change something. anyone feelin me on this??

I believe experienced bassists are probably in pursuit of a specific tone or a “better” tone. Less experienced bassists might be more focused on how they play the instrument and might not be as focused on tone.

I know that I was a lot less concerned with tone for the first several years I played. I just wanted my amp to work and my bass to stay in tune. The knob I turned most often on my amp was the volume. String changes were based more on three pay-period months instead of when the strings became dead. Noisy cords were fine as long as they kept working. A single 15” speaker combo amp was fine and one with an 8 band rotary-knob EQ was advanced. Tone wasn’t very high on the list of concerns, but as the years passed, and my playing ability improved, tone moved up the list.
 
  • Like
Reactions: bobyoung53 and 31HZ