• TalkBass has been independent since 1998. Add your voice.
    Create a free account to reply to discussions, view embedded media, and browse with fewer display ads.
    Join freeLog in
    Want zero display ads or expanded classifieds tools? Compare plans.

Torn. American Pro II Precision V or 1974 4 Bolt P?

I'm torn. I'm all set to buy a P bass but having trouble deciding between a brand new Pro2 P V or a 74 P.

The Am Professional 2 is a five stringer, brand new. I am open to messing around with it, swapping parts if needed, in order to get the sound I'm looking for. It's also about $1K cheaper than the '74. I like the idea of a V stringer, as it will be 100% a studio bass, used only for recording.

But, I'm also drawn to a 74 P I found online. It's a 4 stringer, but looks to have been played a lot over the years, and definitely has some mojo. 4 bolt neck pocket. I've heard some of the 70s basses are duds, though. I wouldn't buy a vintage bass just to swap out parts, so this one would remain stock. I'm willing to give up that low B string to get a guitar with some mojo.

just looking for some inspiration to point me in one direction or the other. I have the budget for either one.
A Pro II in Mercury and dark rosewood board but with four strings …
 
  • Like
Reactions: Ghastly
Prices on 70s Fenders have gone insane IMO. It's not that long ago 70s Fenders were considered junk. Of course not ALL of them are junk but the 70s wasn't exactly Fender's best period. Just because something is old and has a Fender logo doesn't mean it's any good. Personally I'm shocked at the prices people are paying for 70s Fenders. Of course everyone will tell you they got "a good one", which is of course impossible when considering all the junk Fender shipped out the doors in the 70s. The REALLY good vintage Fenders hardly ever come up for sale. And that includes the ones from the 50s and 60s.

Even though Fender's current QC isn't exactly the best in the business they still make more consistently good instruments now than at ANY point in their history. You may not like the V-mod pickup in the Pro (lots of people don't) but a pickup can be replaced. In every other respect the Pro is most likely a FAR better instrument than the '74, even if the '74 is in GOOD condition for it's age. Of course you won't know unless you try both of them but the odds are stacked against the '74, that's for sure!

Do you want a musical instrument or something to show off as a "vintage" Fender?

Unless you can test the '74 and get it at a REALLY good price (like less than half the price of the Pro which would be fair for an old, used, worn instrument if you think about it) I would get the Pro. They may not have the status of a "vintage" Fender but it will most likely be a far superior instrument.
 
  • Like
Reactions: MobileHolmes
I'll take a brand new Fender any day over a vintage one. I've never owned a vintage one and I've never played one, but the newer Fenders are some of the best I've come across. I'm not a 5 string player, but I find the low B on the American Standards and Pro's to play great. I just prefer the 4 string neck size and shape.

I'm also curious about the Metrolines, but if price is equal, I'd take the Fender.

This would be an easier call with pics.
 
Well, I'd roll the dice on the '74 because I've been fortunate with '70's Fenders. If it stinks you can always sell it. The next person might love it. You won't lose your shirt and it's worth a shot. New basses will always be available. The '74 P had a four-bolt neck, TV logo and old style pickups (before they used the brittle sounding ones in '76).
 
I would Buy a used MIA 5 stringer and have it stripped, sealed and refinished in thin nitro. Have it reliced. Instant mojo, the nitro feel on the neck and your color of choice. Plus a solid modern neck with graphite rods.
 
Along with several others here, I'd take the AM Pro 5-string.

But I would choose the 5-string for what's right about it, not because of what might be wrong with the '74 4-string.

And although the Fender P5 I had several years ago had a decent B string, a Nord NP5 Vintage made everything sound better. No bridge pup needed.
 
Last edited:
  • Like
Reactions: Rezdog
In May I picked up up the AM PRO II Jazz V and I was playing a 77 Pbass. The pbass is great, I can't say anything about the 70's basses being duds because mine is amazing. For about a decade I've put it through its paces professionally and it's still going strong.

As much as I love the pbass the jazz is an amazing instrument. Build quality is great, sounds amazing and where it truly wins over the pbass is that it's incredibly light.

I've not done a direct comparison but it's easy half the weight of the P.
It's even lighter than a guitar playing friends AM Ultra Strat which blew all of our minds. Come to think of it, it might even be lighter than my 4 string MIM jazz

I'd say you can't go wrong with either bass. I'd give the vintage bass a shot first to make sure it's as good as it looks but you are in a win win situation.
 
  • Like
Reactions: bassinflorida
So what is mojo? I say it is a combination of two things.
  1. Unrepaired damage, usually to the finish, caused by normal wear & tear.
  2. Improvement in tone and/or playability due to aging.

Item 1 is easily observable. Item 2 is nearly impossible to observe objectively. Does old wood actually sound better than young wood? If it sounds better is it due to the damage or just due to age? Is it real or imagined? Very hard to tell.

Wanting mojo because you like the looks makes sense. Wanting mojo because of a belief that the instrument will somehow be better seems pretty risky to me.

You may have heard the saying "It's an island. If you don't bring it with you it won't be found here".
So, is MOJO to be found in an overrated period bass, Nope. You have to bring it with you too.
 
If you're looking for a good musical instrument, absolutely buy the new 5'er.

If you're looking to reclaim some of your misspent youth (and said youth was in the mid 70's), the 70s P is what you want - nostalgia is why those things fetch more than a few hundred bucks. Beware that its likely quite heavy and probably needs some work to be a decent player. The 70's was Fender's worst period in terms of quality.
 
  • Like
Reactions: MobileHolmes
Prices on 70s Fenders have gone insane IMO. It's not that long ago 70s Fenders were considered junk. Of course not ALL of them are junk but the 70s wasn't exactly Fender's best period. Just because something is old and has a Fender logo doesn't mean it's any good. Personally I'm shocked at the prices people are paying for 70s Fenders. Of course everyone will tell you they got "a good one", which is of course impossible when considering all the junk Fender shipped out the doors in the 70s. The REALLY good vintage Fenders hardly ever come up for sale. And that includes the ones from the 50s and 60s.

I started playing in 1990 and you couldn't give away 70s fenders back then. My dad got my my first bass (MIJ P Copy that appears to be a rebranded Aria Pro II) for 175 and then offered to swap it if i wanted something else if I wanted. So we went back to the shop. They had a blocked and bound Fender Jazz for 225 (presumably 75-79 or so). We both agreed the P copy played and sounded better so I kept that. That J is probably work 3 grand now