• TalkBass has been independent since 1998. Add your voice.
    Create a free account to reply to discussions, view embedded media, and browse with fewer display ads.
    Join freeLog in
    Want zero display ads or expanded classifieds tools? Compare plans.

Turn down or I turn off - another Volume Wars post

i've known some amazing guitar players (mostly, but not always, jazzers) who usually asked for decreased volume settings from everyone when levels were getting out of hand. i've known and played with a few 'hacks' who substituted volume for chops. IME: seems like most jazzers want to 'play with'. i have gotten the sense that rock=loud for most players in the genre.

No. But you don't have as many inexperienced people gigging jazz, and less formal, loud venues (loud bars and concert venues).
 
Not a big fan of the threat to quit. Just quit.

It goes down like this:

Me: Dude you’re playing to loud. This is a 50s rock’n’roll band, not the Grateful Dead.
Dude: yababa, yabba, yabba (keeps playing too loud)
Me: Check ya’s later. I’m not playing with this knobhead.

Life is too short for drawn-out confrontations. It’s just a band. As soon as it isn’t fun, move on.

Unfortunately way too many times this is the best course of action as in my experience.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Roberto Nunez
These guitarists have small penis's or something? In my area, no one is doing ear splitting volume in bars anymore. The current crop of young folk, hipsters, etc., doesn't like it, hence won't patronize clubs or bars unless bands play at a reasonable level.
 
No. But you don't have as many inexperienced people gigging jazz, and less formal, loud venues (loud bars and concert venues).
might just be be the case. but: one of my projects is an instrumental 'jazz' band formulated to compete with rockers: we play lots of rock tunes, pretty loud i think, but at all times we're mindful of 'playing with' the other musicians. it may just be a different take on the relationships between the various instruments: i have to hear 'everything' in order to play my part. and so it goes with the others in the band.

we get too loud at times, but (and this is where your point about experience resonates with me), we just point it out and someone (or everyone) turns down. we might use the words "it's too loud," but that really translates to "have some respect, i'm trying to play here."

maybe: experience = respect. :thumbsup:
 
I recently read an article about clubs that don't hire bands, but have the usual juke-box through a hopped up sound system. The bars that feel they have to really 'crank it', are losing business to clubs that keep the music at a more reasonable level, as the demographic that hangs out actually prefers to talk to one another. This really is a sea change when compared to when I used to go out at night.
 
  • Like
Reactions: jmattbassplaya
I have two solutions.
1. Move the guitarists' ears to the back of their knees.
2. Put the guitar cabs in front of and firing at the player.

I suggested #2 to a LOUD guitarist once. He said "then it'll blow my head off". Well yeah, that's how we feel. He refused. I fulfilled my gig commitment then quit the group.

I made the exact same suggestion to a too loud guitarist once. His reponse? "Ugh, I hate that tone." Yes. His own tone. The very same one he'd been killing me with all night. LOL!
 
Played with another guitarist. We used to play 75-125 cap clubs, he ran through ... get ready:
Marshall 100 watt tube head
Marshall 4x12
AND ... AND ...
a 12" monitor in front of him running guitar only!

He still claimed that he couldn't hear himself. Never wears earplugs. Told me that he has to sleep with the TV on or else the ringing keeps him awake. Gee, ya think?

The VOX monitors in that band would kill a small dog.
 
  • Like
Reactions: RoadRanger
There's never a wrong time for earplugs. Enjoy your EEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEE

Absolutely. I prefer to rehearse at non-earplug volumes, but that isn't always possible in a small, acoustically live rehearsal area. I have enough hearing loss in one ear that I wear earplugs any time I can do so and still hear what I'm playing.

And the comment was made earlier about "why do we need a second guitarist in a 60's band?"

Ever heard of rhythm guitar?
 
Man, no drummers, no rhythm guitarists...now I remember why I left CT ;)

You know, I hate the terms "lead guitar" and "rhythm guitar". Someone who can play guitar should be able to do both, even at the same time if needed.
I agree with you - it's the same guitar.
With that said - there have been some great rhythm guitariISTS - who have focused on being part of the rhythm section and supporting the soloist. Bob Weir is a classic example, at least in his role in the GD. John Lennon was another IMO.
 
Man, no drummers, no rhythm guitarists...now I remember why I left CT ;)
I actually have several drummers available if anyone needs one.
You know, I hate the terms "lead guitar" and "rhythm guitar". Someone who can play guitar should be able to do both, even at the same time if needed.
I've found that leaving off the labels ends up with no guitarist in the rhythm section :( .