TalkBass has been independent since 1998. Add your voice.
Create a free account to reply to discussions, view embedded media, and browse with fewer display ads.
Join free Log in
Want zero display ads or expanded classifieds tools? Compare plans.
And it would be really cool, FYIYou could power that cab with thisView attachment 4543345
Speakers don't give power, they take it.
Similar deal here: 500 watt head (into minimum 4 ohm load) running a pair of 350 watt/8 ohm 2x10 cabs and it's Godzilla loud without anything boosted and the master volume set no higher than 10 o'clock.My set up is very similar to the example you used. I’ve been mainly using 2 500W 210s with a 300W head for the last 4 years. No issues so far.
Just thought I'd throw this one out there, and see what the general consensus is. I've heard many differing and often conflicting ideas on this topic, over the years. Do you see any issue in under-powering a cab ?
Example: Say I have Neo 212 cab, that's rated at 1000 watts RMS @ 4ohms, not "peak", "program" or "musical" watts, as often spun by marketers. Real continuous RMS watts.
Now say I match it with a class-D head, that does 300w @ 4ohms, or even 500w @ 4ohms. What's the downside ? Is there a downside ? Is it bad for the cab in some way ? Will the cab not perform optimally, unless it's driven hard ?
I see a lot of rigs, the other way round... a 500w head (or more) into a cab that's rated @ 300w RMS. Obviously, it just takes a little common sense, with the volume knob. I rarely see rigs where the cab capacity is significantly above the output of the amp.
What say ye ?
Not an issue. It was the conventional wisdom back in the 80s for some reason. I would love to know who started it.
Awesome evenAnd it would be really cool, FYI
As sensitivity goes up, bass response and handling goes down. Distortion goes up also.Don't know exactly where to chime in. Loudness is based on a speak cab's efficiency rating. A cab with 91 db @ one watt one meter. A cab with 101 db one watt one meter. The 101 is going to be 10 times louder than the 91.
So the 1,000 watt RMS cab's loudness depends on it rating at one watt, one meter.
Of course it doesn't hurt anything to "under power" a cab as you call it.
And by the way, a small watt amp can blow out a high rated cab. So, take a 300 watt amp, turn it up to "11", go "wham city" on your bass and you WILL BLOW OUT your cab. As an amp is over ran, it can put out full current and fry speakers.
I'm sure someone will clarify what I'm trying to say here.
For loudness, you want efficient bass cabs. Anything over 99 db, one watt one meter will be max loudness with minimal power.
(There are trade-offs with low efficient cabs vs high efficient cabs. One is louder but the other has better sound.........generalizing and not always the case.)
For example, every increase of 10 dB on the decibel scale is equal to a 10-fold increase in sound pressure level (SPL). Near silence is expressed as 0 dB but a sound measured at 10 dB is actually 10 times louder
This is a gross generalization that is only sometimes true.As sensitivity goes up, bass response and handling goes down. Distortion goes up also.
This may have been the start of the misunderstanding. Unfortunately, the details have been taken out of context so badly as to create such urban myths.JBL with a white paper that was greatly misunderstood then and still is to this day.![]()
This may have been the start of the misunderstanding. Unfortunately, the details have been taken out of context so badly as to create such urban myths.
If folks were to really understand the paper, they would discover that JBL actually recommends DECREASING the power to speakers to 50% of rated power for musical instrument applications to account dis distortion and compression increases in signal density. Tweeters are handled differently and are responsible for some of the misunderstanding.
Don't know exactly where to chime in. Loudness is based on a speak cab's efficiency rating. A cab with 91 db @ one watt one meter. A cab with 101 db one watt one meter. The 101 is going to be 10 times louder than the 91.