• TalkBass has been independent since 1998. Add your voice.
    Create a free account to reply to discussions, view embedded media, and browse with fewer display ads.
    Join freeLog in
    Want zero display ads or expanded classifieds tools? Compare plans.

Used "wet" wood?

No, I'm not using any, nor am I suggesting it. I want to know if anyone has built a bass/guitar/whatever with non-dried wood and what were the results.

I have read several second or third-hand accounts of wood warping, poor tone, cracking, etc... Most of the damage I've read about was on hollow-bodies. But, I'd like to get some first-hand accounts of the woes of wet wood.

So, if you've ever built a solid-body with wet wood (not sufficiently dried for musical instrument use), whether for a practice, template, or an expensive project, what happened?

-Dave
 
Entry level crap brand. My first fiver was a Samick and it was complete junk. That "instrument" is one of the reasons I started building 16 years ago; so I guess there is a positive side to that story. :)
 
This is what the top on my bass used to look like. After about a year the finish went all ripply on me (no pic at the moment). Refinishing would probably cut thru the dye so I'm going to leave it.
100_1897.jpg
 
I'll have to snap a pic and post it, but one of my acoustics has a finish that's permanently toasted because the wood was not fully dry before the instrument was built. It appears to have a semi-translucent milky-white haze throughout it...
 
Hi.

Gibson in the late 80's/early 90's.

Rumour has it that Gibson sold their wood inventory to Japan and had to use unseasoned wood for a while. Whether that's true or not I don't know.
What I do know is that Gibsons from that era tend to show more repairs in that area and also more cracks in the finish in that area.

I've repaired several detached set-in necks from that era.

The shrinking can be measured so it's just not the usual sloppy Gibson workmanship.

Regards
Sam