• TalkBass has been independent since 1998. Add your voice.
    Create a free account to reply to discussions, view embedded media, and browse with fewer display ads.
    Join freeLog in
    Want zero display ads or expanded classifieds tools? Compare plans.

Valenti J5 Soundclips (Rounds v. Flats Content)

Altitude

An ounce of perception, a pound of obscure.
Supporting Member
Mar 9, 2005
11,194
14,081
55
Denver, nee Austin
(I can see how this post could go in any of the Basses, Strings, or Recordings forums. Mods - please do your worst!)

Recently I decided to try a set of Chromes on my Valenti 5 string J bass. As a contribution to the ongoing "flatwounds vs. roundwounds" debate, I thought it would be fun to create some comparison soundclips of that bass with the rounds and the flats, so that you could all hear them and argue about which sounds better.

First, the bass. This is a Valenti 5-string Jazz bass with a maple neck and an ash body. It has Nordstrand NJ5 pickups and a Sadowsky preamp. This is an incredible bass. It weighs about 8 pounds, the pickups are very growly, and the bass is rather bright by nature. The neck is relatively shallow and feels great to me. @Nino Valenti

Here's the bass:

GABXPi7KDQCVnpoRN_ZJEKALX83N5GXtiZBQHYwwE_OQ0LOdDnc8LDcsLdgqlC4UyZTSiCYomUd3JAVowXg=w986-h739-no.jpg

PdKjUyZzQCyT22frglHnsUNW1dqFYrzOgWXuRNRxzvu3M26FcuF2N29-TwjepUGXRU3xowa1XPV7w0M0Dpw=w555-h739-no.jpg


Now for the recordings.

I decided to record simple 16-bar loops for Latin, Rock, and Funk styles and playing as close to the very same bass parts as I could, recording them a couple of weeks apart.

All of the recordings are Bass-->Cable-->iRig-->iPad (GarageBand). The VTC on the bass was rolled off about halfway, the preamp bass was very slightly boosted, and the preamp treble was flat. This is how I use this bass 99% of the time on gigs. In GarageBand I used the simple directbox input setting and added some drums to make the part sound more authentic.

The "roundwound" strings are actually GHS Pressurewounds and fairly broken in, so certainly not as sparkly as roundwound strings can be. Again, this bass is bright by nature, and I've found that I have to move one step in the "mellow" string category direction to get the tone I'm after.

The "flatwound" strings are Chromes, pretty much straight out of the box with perhaps an hour of play time on them. The do indeed still have some zing, which I think you can hear more in the room than you can on the recordings. I might return later and do a third take once these have settled in.

Both sets of strings were medium gauge.

To the tracks. Crank it up!

The Funk Track
I did an aggressive funk lick, vaguely Mark King-ish, and tried to hit all of the strings a little, except I didn't play the B ever.

Pressurewounds:


Chromes:


The Rock Track
Straight 8th notes track, I dug in to try to pull some of the growl out of the bass, which it was happy to provide. I played this with a pick and I am NOT a pick player, so please forgive my terrible technique.

Pressurewounds:


Chromes:


The Latin Track
This is a Mozambique pattern, one of my favorites because I heard Patitucci and Weckl kill it on all those Elektric Band records. On this one I tried to keep the tone of the bass a little smoother.

Pressurewounds:


Chromes:


Conclusions
Given that the Chromes were fresh and the Pressurewounds weren't, I expected the tracks to sound more similar than different, and I think they do. To my ears though, the bass takes to the Chromes very well and I could certainly play a convincing set with my horn funk band using this setup. I wonder whether I will still feel that way after ~20 hours of play time.

I think I like the Pressurewounds better on the Rock track. The added sparkle and additional growl really work well in that style.

The Latin track sounds essentially the same to me with either string - which means I would 100% choose the Chromes if that were my normal gig style, for the feel and ease of upkeep alone.

In any case, I think Pressurewounds and Chromes are both fantastic strings, and the Valenti bass is still a winner 11 years after Nino built it for me (it is #51).

Please let me know what you think too. I hope you enjoy!
 
Last edited:
Good sounding bass and very nice playing! Thanks for taking the time to do the comparison and sharing.

I preferred the Pressurewounds on the Funk and Rock tracks. But I preferred the Chromes on the Latin track.

Either way they’re nice string sets. I’ve used both and liked them a lot.
 
(I can see how this post could go in any of the Basses, Strings, or Recordings forums. Mods - please do your worst!)

Recently I decided to try a set of Chromes on my Valenti 5 string J bass. As a contribution to the ongoing "flatwounds vs. roundwounds" debate, I thought it would be fun to create some comparison soundclips of that bass with the rounds and the flats, so that you could all hear them and argue about which sounds better.

First, the bass. This is a Valenti 5-string Jazz bass with a maple neck and an ash body. It has Nordstrand NJ5 pickups and a Sadowsky preamp. This is an incredible bass. It weighs about 8 pounds, the pickups are very growly, and the bass is rather bright by nature. The neck is relatively shallow and feels great to me. @Nino Valenti

Here's the bass:

View attachment 3128341
View attachment 3128342

Now for the recordings.

I decided to record simple 16-bar loops for Latin, Rock, and Funk styles and playing as close to the very same bass parts as I could, recording them a couple of weeks apart.

All of the recordings are Bass-->Cable-->iRig-->iPad (GarageBand). The VTC on the bass was rolled off about halfway, the preamp bass was very slightly boosted, and the preamp treble was flat. This is how I use this bass 99% of the time on gigs. In GarageBand I used the simple directbox input setting and added some drums to make the part sound more authentic.

The "roundwound" strings are actually GHS Pressurewounds and fairly broken in, so certainly not as sparkly as roundwound strings can be. Again, this bass is bright by nature, and I've found that I have to move one step in the "mellow" string category direction to get the tone I'm after.

The "flatwound" strings are Chromes, pretty much straight out of the box with perhaps an hour of play time on them. The do indeed still have some zing, which I think you can hear more in the room than you can on the recordings. I might return later and do a third take once these have settled in.

Both sets of strings were medium gauge.

To the tracks. Crank it up!

The Funk Track
I did an aggressive funk lick, vaguely Mark King-ish, and tried to hit all of the strings a little, except I didn't play the B ever.

Pressurewounds:


Chromes:


The Rock Track
Straight 8th notes track, I dug in to try to pull some of the growl out of the bass, which it was happy to provide. I played this with a pick and I am NOT a pick player, so please forgive my terrible technique.

Pressurewounds:


Chromes:


The Latin Track
This is a Mozambique pattern, one of my favorites because I heard Patitucci and Weckl kill it on all those Elektric Band records. On this one I tried to keep the tone of the bass a little smoother.

Pressurewounds:


Chromes:


Conclusions
Given that the Chromes were fresh and the Pressurewounds weren't, I expected the tracks to sound more similar than different, and I think they do. To my ears though, the bass takes to the Chromes very well and I could certainly play a convincing set with my horn funk band using this setup. I wonder whether I will still feel that way after ~20 hours of play time.

I think I like the Pressurewounds better on the Rock track. The added sparkle and additional growl really work well in that style.

The Latin track sounds essentially the same to me with either string - which means I would 100% choose the Chromes if that were my normal gig style, for the feel and ease of upkeep alone.

In any case, I think Pressurewounds and Chromes are both fantastic strings, and the Valenti bass is still a winner 11 years after Nino built it for me (it is #51).

Please let me know what you think too. I hope you enjoy!


That Valenti is nice, but you can play!
 
Great comparison.
I like how chromes sound in the latin and rock samples. Pressurewounds do have an edge in the funk sample. I wonder if that can be changed with a slight EQ tweak however; you mentioned you used your usual settings with a slight boost on bass and treble flat. I'll guess this is your setting for the rounds. Flats are different, they might sound more similar if you reverse your EQ and ran bass flat and slightly turn up treble.
On the bright side, if you can make the chromes sound good for all your material, you have a low maintenance and consistence set up. The chromes won't take more than a week to break in, and then they will sound the same for years. I don't look after my strings, and they still last me 3-4 years.
I've been using chromes on a bright bass with unforgiving clarity for several years now; a Warwick Dolphin. I played latin, funk, blues and some jazz gigs with it. My bands prefer the sound as well.
 
  • Like
Reactions: dralionux
Great comparison.
I like how chromes sound in the latin and rock samples. Pressurewounds do have an edge in the funk sample. I wonder if that can be changed with a slight EQ tweak however; you mentioned you used your usual settings with a slight boost on bass and treble flat. I'll guess this is your setting for the rounds. Flats are different, they might sound more similar if you reverse your EQ and ran bass flat and slightly turn up treble.
On the bright side, if you can make the chromes sound good for all your material, you have a low maintenance and consistence set up. The chromes won't take more than a week to break in, and then they will sound the same for years. I don't look after my strings, and they still last me 3-4 years.
I've been using chromes on a bright bass with unforgiving clarity for several years now; a Warwick Dolphin. I played latin, funk, blues and some jazz gigs with it. My bands prefer the sound as well.
The Chromes are on it now and I’m going to leave them there a while. Seems like there’s no point examining flats if I don’t do it for a while so I also get to enjoy not soaking them and stuff. I agree the EQ will need some work.
 
  • Like
Reactions: SteveFromBerlin
Thanks for taking the time and effort to put all this together. I find it very interesting!

I was surprised at how minor the differences in sound were! The Chromes are definitely a bit darker in sound but still have plenty of zing. I'd expect some, if not a lot of that zing would disappear over time, but I don't really know - I've never used Chromes.

It would be interesting to hear the difference after the Chromes were broken in. Pressurewounds are my string of choice - I've never been able to find a set of flats that I didn't have some minor problem with. And most roundwounds are just too zingy for me!
 
  • Like
Reactions: SteveFromBerlin
I was surprised at how minor the differences in sound were! The Chromes are definitely a bit darker in sound but still have plenty of zing. I'd expect some, if not a lot of that zing would disappear over time, but I don't really know - I've never used Chromes.
I think the instrument makes as much difference as the strings. This bass wants to sound clear and forward no matter what. I’ve had it a long time and it’s always been that way. I have a St. Blues P-bass that takes the mellow road, pretty much no matter what.

It’s a 15-minute exercise to run another track on those files once the Chromes settle in; I’m happy to do it. My guess is that they’ll sound a bit more mellow than they do now, but it will still sound like the same bass.
 
Last edited: