Can someone explain the benefit of keeping your instrument volume at 90% as opposed to fully open? I’ve heard people espouse this technique with no real explanation.
TalkBass has been independent since 1998. Add your voice.
Create a free account to reply to discussions, view embedded media, and browse with fewer display ads.
Join free Log in
Want zero display ads or expanded classifieds tools? Compare plans.
Can someone explain the benefit of keeping your instrument volume at 90% as opposed to fully open? I’ve heard people espouse this technique with no real explanation.
With Fender PBs and JBs you get less of a trebly tone. Other basses, I just notice less volume. Now depending on how your signal change is managed on the way to the output stage of your amp might change the tone, but as for the output of the bass itself, not so much with other brands. One more thing is there might be less noise from interference with some basses that are not shielded well.Can someone explain the benefit of keeping your instrument volume at 90% as opposed to fully open? I’ve heard people espouse this technique with no real explanation.
I think I might add this to my signatureIf everything is loud, music gets boring real quick (I've seen the Ramones in concert, and learned that). You gotta pick your spots to be at full bore, no matter what genre you are playing.

Feel free to quote or plagiarize at will.I think I might add this to my signature![]()
My bass teacher said he'd do it if there was a chance the sound guy would screw him in the mix.
Main problem with this is if you turn up your bass after sound check, the sound engineer can just lower it again at the board.I feel like it is often sandbagging because we don't trust the sound tech or rest of the band to manage volume levels correctly.
Yes, and sound-tech-darwin-bass will so give me full volume and use fingers for dynamics, please.Main problem with this is if you turn up your bass after sound check, the sound engineer can just lower it again at the board.
This is why I dial back the volume on my G&L M-2500 in my bands' performance space, which has an Eden/SWR rig. The Eden head does NOT like my M-2500 at full volume, even with the input pad engaged. As you said, the tone is not affected at all by this, which is an advantage of active electronics.- Active bass: Signal could be too hot going into your amp or pedals. Active electronics don't have the same attenuation that passive basses do, so this only affects volume.
Tonal changes. A little extra volume.Can someone explain the benefit of keeping your instrument volume at 90% as opposed to fully open? I’ve heard people espouse this technique with no real explanation.
This is one reason why I really don't like Jazz style Basses!Not on a two volume pot passive Fender Jazz, each pickup sounds cruddy unless fully up unless the other pickup is fully off.
I call that creamy tone my "velvet" setting.I first heard about this, running the volume at less than full, here at Talkbass a few years ago.
It sounded strange to me, but I tried it, and liked it.
It kind of gives a slightly cleaner signal to the amp without much loss in volume.
I get the best, most noticeable results with my Gibson SG bass, which has Volume/Volume/Tone controls like a Jazz bass.
With both volume controls at max, the bass sounds OK, but it really comes to life when you set one or both volumes to less than full.
When I set the bridge pickup to about 90% and the neck anywhere from 30 to 70%, it gives a nice, creamy Jazz bass-type tone with the amount of fullness
set by the neck pickup's volume.
This is not as noticeable with my other two pickup basses, as they have blend controls.
A trick I didn't know about for 50 years.
Mike
This is the only reason I know of wanting to do this (though it works better with guitar when you're playing straight through an amp with with a slightly distorted tone and want to clean it up a bit mid-song or for a different song).It kind of gives a slightly cleaner signal to the amp without much loss in volume.