However, I know of at least four basses which needed complete overhauls including re-graduated tops, new bass bars and re-set necks. For me, that means the bad ones are incredibly bad.
Playing devil's advocate, when you say "need" above, does that mean the basses in question were unplayable or broken and as is useless to the owner, or does it mean they needed the work to become optimal, and after the work was done, they were better basses?
This is relevant as many builders seem to attach different price points depending on the detail of the work they do on different levels of basses. I suppose this translates into hours spent, but I'm always a bit suspicious when a builder of "handmade" instruments doesn't put his "all" from a craftsmanship standpoint into every instrument in order to fit into a marketing scheme and price point. In other words, how much more work does it take to get those graduations or bass bar just right? Fancy purfling, special scrolls and other details that are costly from a labor standpoint and don't relate to the performance of the instrument are another thing completely.
Bass Cellar in Cincinnati has a line of basses where they hand make the bodies to a high level of craftsmanship, but use factory necks with pre-carved scrolls to keep the price lower.
Should one assume that a hand made bass going out the door for $12k is not going to have the attention to detail or other cost cutting measures of a $20k bass? I think that would be a fair assumption. Of course attention to detail of the important structural elements of the build, like a neck set, should be unquestionable.
Last edited: