I bought a fender american jazz bass deluxe and a warwick corevette (bubinga with active/passive pickups) with the intent of trying one and returning the one I didnt like. GC has a great return policy.
Warwick I paid 700 bucks which is already a couple hundred bucks off the normal price. Fender I paid around 1300 for.
After playing both of them, I really liked the warwick sound - very growly and LOUD compared to the fender. The tone was pretty good as well. The only downside is that it was heavier the fender and the neck was very big and around compared to a fender (or any other bass ive tried). This is something that takes alot of getting used too. But the sound you get from the warwick is something that may force you to get used to the neck. In fact now after playing it for a weeks I actually feel I can fret faster then I do on my schecter which has a similar neck design as the fender.
Now the fender, has a VERY sweet sounding tone that most basses try to mimic. Its a unique tone that. Do I think the fender is worth 1300 dollars? maybe, it seem very plain/vanilla to me even with the sunburst top. The warwick has a "boutique" feel to me I guess and is extremely solid. Which does change the sound a little compared to the fender. Would I have kept the fender if I didnt have the warwick to try out? I think so as its a very nice bass, but I felt its a bit overpriced for the money.