TalkBass has been independent since 1998. Add your voice.
Create a free account to reply to discussions, view embedded media, and browse with fewer display ads.
Join free Log in
Want zero display ads or expanded classifieds tools? Compare plans.
I mean, partying, buying food that isn't provided for you at the meal centers. I know for a fact that University of Florida and Florida State University football players are only allowed 2 meals per day from the dining facilities.
Beyond that you have smaller, quality of life things that other students with full ride scholarships still need, like:
sheets,
shoes,
clothing,
snacks for your dorm room,
the occasional dinner with friends at some cheap franchise store, and you don't want to feel like the poor guy at the table because you have no money, so you only get water and then eat breadsticks all night,
money to rent or buy a movie,
to get the new CD you want,
to buy a bass,
Fraternity dues,
Dinner with your girlfriend NOT at the meal center,
etc.,
I can go on and on.
These things are definitely not essential to life, sure, but without playing football or basketball or whatever, these kids could be out with a college job somewhere at Starbucks or something, and earning their own money to do with as they please. Instead, they have to devote 15+ hours each week to football so you can sit back on your couch, drink a beer, and enjoy the fruits of their labors.
I think it's time for you to stop being butthurt about this.
Take the name "sports" out of it and call it "advertising". It's a business model. The advertise programs that meet on fields, in gyms and on tracks are marketing. The better the advertising, the better the draw of customers (students). You pay for advertising in the regular business world, why should this be any different. I suppose you could call them interns, but the fact remains that they do the work, they should share in the profits.
Well. I see it as just another way to get your tuition paid. You can go the brain-way or the sports-way, I don't actually see any difference between the two apart from the obvious. The sports-way generates a lot more money than the brain-way it is true, but that doesn't alter the fact that you do get your education paid. Considering the opportunities for the athletes, I'd say it's a pretty sweet deal even though they don't get much of the profits the college reaps from it.
The one thing people forget is that there are no minor leagues for Pro football. Hockey, basketball and baseball all do. They can get paid there and try to improve and make a career for themselves. The CFL is not the minor leagues of the NFL - the NCAA is the equivalent of the minor leagues for the NFL, and the NCAA, a monopoly, with no checks and balances, squeeze every penny they can out of these players.
The whole system could use an overhaul, but it's just disgraceful to me for the colleges to NOT pay the players anything at all, under the guise of "integrity" and "college morals" etc...while the colleges rake it in and recently, sell out to new conferences to make even more money.
Yep. And none of that "boatload of money" goes to the players who wear the uniforms that bear the Nike logo.I suspect they make more money on endorsements (Nike,etc), than they do on actual ticket sales. The coaches can and many do make a boatload of money.
The one thing people forget is that there are no minor leagues for Pro football. Hockey, basketball and baseball all do. They can get paid there and try to improve and make a career for themselves. The CFL is not the minor leagues of the NFL - the NCAA is the equivalent of the minor leagues for the NFL, and the NCAA, a monopoly, with no checks and balances, squeeze every penny they can out of these players.
The whole system could use an overhaul, but it's just disgraceful to me for the colleges to NOT pay the players anything at all, under the guise of "integrity" and "college morals" etc...while the colleges rake it in and recently, sell out to new conferences to make even more money.
It is the difference between a doctor practically giving his training years for free in hope of a higher paid future. The athlete who plays in a money generating sport has given away some of his most productive years as the cartel known as the NCAA, as the Olympic Committee dropped out of the slavery business, allows Miami of Ohio to keep some male football and basketball players.
It is the principle of the matter that bothers me. They are in college for an education, they are not paid athletes, nor should they be, even if you consider it(the dollar amount) to be a pittance.

So Arena Football isn't considered minor league? This is a legit question, too. I figured if you didn't make the cut in the NFL you either went there or Canada to play.
So Arena Football isn't considered minor league? This is a legit question, too. I figured if you didn't make the cut in the NFL you either went there or Canada to play.
It may not be a "Minor League" as MLB sees its minor leagues but just as basketball players who are unable to make it in the NBA or for their national team travel all over the world to keep their "hoop dream" alive. It is a minor league in that the pay is lower and it is a last chance to keep playing as they have aged out of or flunked out of NCAA football. And in the back of many minds is that they can be the next Kurt Warner.No - first of all, it's a different game.
Second, those teams are not actually team or property of their professional counterparts.
MLB has thier own teams in the minors...same with hockey and the NBA has the D-League, all with teams that belong to the Pro team.
The NFL has only a practice squad, not another team or league.
...These things are definitely not essential to life, sure, but without playing football or basketball or whatever, these kids could be out with a college job somewhere at Starbucks or something, and earning their own money to do with as they please. Instead, they have to devote 15+ hours each week to football so you can sit back on your couch, drink a beer, and enjoy the fruits of their labors.
I believe exactly to the contrary. I believe that they are entitled to be appropriately paid employees of the institution in the same sense that Teaching or Research Assistants are! They are making a valuable contribution in their own specific part of the college experience. To me, "appropriately" goes well beyond scholarships and board.
The principle to me is that they are living a lie, stating that they are amateurs. The institution benefits from their efforts in a way that is hugely disproportionate to their scholarship support.
Example: Research Assistants get scholarships and are also allowed to hold outside jobs. Their contributions are often minor and lead to discoveries with limited (at best) commercial value. Athletes can't hold jobs, can't sell anything they receive as a gift related to athletics, and provide support for a multi-million dollar athletic enterprise.
If they are not in school for an education, they don't belong in college. Why don't schools just outsource them as employees and skip the education altogether. After all, that seems to be the sentiment, that they are here to play sports not learn, why not separate the two? Then they can be paid as amateurs without the guise that they are doing anything other than a job.