Thats the problem with basically every adaptation of King's work. Its either too short and leaves out a lot of the good stuff, or its way too long and incredibly cheesy, as in, poorly cast, acted, and directed. Ive always enjoyed Kubrick's version of The Shining.
Also, I recently reread Burgess' "A Clockwork Orange", and the second go around I actually became more fond of Kubrick's film adaptation than the book itself, with exception to the 'americanized' ending, of course. I think Kubrick really brought a lot of good visual to accompany the story that the book really lacked. Sure, its a book and you can't 'see' it per se, but the tone of the book could really use some more vibrant imagery.
Also, I recently reread Burgess' "A Clockwork Orange", and the second go around I actually became more fond of Kubrick's film adaptation than the book itself, with exception to the 'americanized' ending, of course. I think Kubrick really brought a lot of good visual to accompany the story that the book really lacked. Sure, its a book and you can't 'see' it per se, but the tone of the book could really use some more vibrant imagery.