Three takeaways from the various replies to this ballooning thread:
1. I've never seen guys so willing to boast about how little time they lasted!

2. There's a segment of our community who seem to dismiss "other's" opinions because "other's" have not attained the lofty talent/popularity perch of the artist being discussed. Bilge. Art is for the expression of the artist, or the enjoyment of the consumer. We are all entitled to critique any art or artist. It's our job. Otherwise there's no reason for art to exist.
Their model says only Bach can opine on Ravel. Only Rembrandt can speak on Picasso. Drivel.
3. Art, like beauty, is in the eye (or ear) of the beholder.
You can decorate a canvas with explosive diarrhea, even get a gallery to display it, but you can't convince me it's art. All you have done with your self absorption is crowd out other deserving talents vying for the same exposure or server space.
When, after our acknowledging that Flea is a talented and creative player, you dismiss us as "harsh....judgmental..... know nothings... for being less than enthusiastic about this performance, you diminish the value of your opinions.
I really hope Flea was just having us on a bit. That this was an out take, or some bit of spontaneous improv after the real filming, since the crew and location were already paid for.
Otherwise I'd have to view it as a fail. It spurred no interest in the bass, or the player (despite his resume).
Don't know how many more of these missteps Fender can afford.