TalkBass has been independent since 1998. Add your voice.
Create a free account to reply to discussions, view embedded media, and browse with fewer display ads.
Join free Log in
Want zero display ads or expanded classifieds tools? Compare plans.
Yeah the ergonomics on the Mockingbird are really weird. I had two of them and while they sounded great and looked beautiful, I just could not get used to them. I would even miss notes while playing them because of how weird they felt. Even my Warlock, Iceman and Explorer were easier to play.Two basses I really wanted to connect with but just couldn't were the Rickenbacker 4001/4003 and BC Rich Mockingbird. Nothing wrong with the sound or build on those, they were top notch. It was just the ergonomics, I could not be comfortable playing those basses.
Back around 1973 I re-relocated (I was born there) to Cincinnati from upstate NY. I left my main bass, a Hagstrom Coronado at my folks' house, and traveled with a 1964 Hofner for which I had traded (I kid you not) a xylophone. It was cool since, staying in my uncle's basement in Fairfield, it was acoustic enough to be satisfying... but then with that midwestern weather, that river pall, I began to notice that I could predict immanent storms by things the neck did. After I moved there, I traded it for a Kay upright (that also predicted the weather).I've tried many basses that I could tell within five-minutes playing time that I'd never be able to bond with, so right back on the wall they went. Most notably, Hofners. They feel somewhat insubstantial to me.
It even had a TORT !!!My EBMM Stingray. Had it for a few weeks than sold it.
View attachment 5298686 View attachment 5298687
That's how I bought it lol.It even had a TORT !!!
That is why it didn't sound as good!! Tort helps everything!
That is why it didn't sound as good!! Tort helps everything!
Oh come on!! It's better than your amp going to "11".Um....ok![]()
![]()