• TalkBass has been independent since 1998. Add your voice.
    Create a free account to reply to discussions, view embedded media, and browse with fewer display ads.
    Join freeLog in
    Want zero display ads or expanded classifieds tools? Compare plans.

What Chris Squire Gave Us

Jul 30, 2012
1,505
992
In lieu of all the RIP's and memories concerning Chris Squire after his passing, I'd just like to share this thought on what Squire gave us as bass guitarists.

Most significantly, Chris Squire approached the bass guitar as a musical instrument, he didn’t just see the bass as a part of the rhythm section that had this very clear and limited role that it must play. For Squire, the bass could be a rhythmic instrument, but it could also be a melodic instrument full of expression, and it could even be a harmonic instrument full of chords. It could be an instrument that provided texture to the song by changing the sound of the instrument to sound like just about anything using all the effects and processing devices that any guitarist might use. In short, the bass guitar could do anything that you wanted it to do, it was a complete musical instrument that was only limited by your imagination, and Squire had a lot of imagination.

Chris Squire showed that the bass could not only be the backbone of the rhythm of the song, it could completely drive and define the song, as he did with so many of his bass lines. Take a classic bass line like “Roundabout”, not only is that bass line just this really bizarre mixture of melody and rhythm that no bassist other than Squire would come up with, but that bass line completely makes that song. Take that bass line away and “Roundabout” becomes a completely different song.

And then there’s something like “The Fish”, his instrumental that consisted solely of overdubbed bass guitar parts, like a little symphony for bass guitar; showing in effect that this “lowly instrument” could do it all, and he flipping recorded that in 1971! No one had ever done anything like that on the bass before.

The man was a true pioneer of his instrument, and any bass player that picks up the bass and chooses to play something a little “out of the box” of what is expected from the instrument owes a little something to Chris Squire.
 
Jaco Taco, you hit the nail on the head with "imagination". Besides CS's bass parts being a fantastic blend of rhythm, melody and harmony - and that signature tone, they always left me thinking "How did he come up with that?" And no other part would do. He OWNED his parts, the same way Ringo did way more than play "beats" or "fills".
Great point. And if you isolate a lot of his bass part you think "how can that possibly work in that part?" But with the rest of the parts added - magic!
 
Jaco Taco, you hit the nail on the head with "imagination". Besides CS's bass parts being a fantastic blend of rhythm, melody and harmony - and that signature tone, they always left me thinking "How did he come up with that?" And no other part would do. He OWNED his parts, the same way Ringo did way more than play "beats" or "fills".

I also think Squire had great feel. It's easy to talk about all the creative, unusual things he did on bass, but at the end of the day the man also could lay down a groove as well.
 
In lieu of all the RIP's and memories concerning Chris Squire after his passing, I'd just like to share this thought on what Squire gave us as bass guitarists.

Most significantly, Chris Squire approached the bass guitar as a musical instrument, he didn’t just see the bass as a part of the rhythm section that had this very clear and limited role that it must play. For Squire, the bass could be a rhythmic instrument, but it could also be a melodic instrument full of expression, and it could even be a harmonic instrument full of chords. It could be an instrument that provided texture to the song by changing the sound of the instrument to sound like just about anything using all the effects and processing devices that any guitarist might use. In short, the bass guitar could do anything that you wanted it to do, it was a complete musical instrument that was only limited by your imagination, and Squire had a lot of imagination.

Chris Squire showed that the bass could not only be the backbone of the rhythm of the song, it could completely drive and define the song, as he did with so many of his bass lines. Take a classic bass line like “Roundabout”, not only is that bass line just this really bizarre mixture of melody and rhythm that no bassist other than Squire would come up with, but that bass line completely makes that song. Take that bass line away and “Roundabout” becomes a completely different song.

And then there’s something like “The Fish”, his instrumental that consisted solely of overdubbed bass guitar parts, like a little symphony for bass guitar; showing in effect that this “lowly instrument” could do it all, and he flipping recorded that in 1971! No one had ever done anything like that on the bass before.

The man was a true pioneer of his instrument, and any bass player that picks up the bass and chooses to play something a little “out of the box” of what is expected from the instrument owes a little something to Chris Squire.

Completely agree with you. He changed the sound, the place and the function of the instrument.
On the stage Squire played like if everything he did was simple, easy, natural. And singed while playing those bass lines...
He also brougt the harmonics to the bass sound and melody. Before him I don' t remember anyone using them so intensely.
When Chris started most players used flat strings and a dark sound. Nothing wrong with that, but the place of the bass player, unless you were a real proddigy, seemed to be "do your little part, play the root, keep the rithm and don't bother". He buried that concept. With theory and technic? No. With talent.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Jaco Taco
I think between Chris's work with Yes - and Greg Lake's work with ELP - the world of electric bass (as in: look, role, and sound) was forever changed. And most definitely for the better.

Chris will always be a genuine icon for me.

You just didn't get lyrical things like this from a bassist before guys like Chris and Greg started doing it:



Not even from Entwistle, who came close - but not quite. (And I'm an Entwistle admirer too.)
 
Last edited:
Generally, I hear Jon Anderson taking the highest vocal parts in Yes, not Chris Squire; however, his voice was perhaps the biggest contributor to the trademark Yes harmony sound, more so than Howe or others.

From my perspective, Chris gave us bass parts which were integral to the song, often contrapuntal rather than mere root notes or doubling. While I like much of the Rabin era, Squire's role seems to have diminished during this period as compared to earlier material. Chris seemed to successfully ride the fine line between stepping out while still supporting the song.