• TalkBass has been independent since 1998. Add your voice.
    Create a free account to reply to discussions, view embedded media, and browse with fewer display ads.
    Join freeLog in
    Want zero display ads or expanded classifieds tools? Compare plans.

What I wish Fender would make...

Fender should stop duplicating that stupid truss rod adjustment design where you need to take the neck off, does not matter if is period correct, it is something that should have never existed.

Agreed. I'm kind of surprised that Leo ever let that shortcoming slip through his otherwise genius designs (although many of the pre-CBS Fender bass necks I've seen sat high enough in the pocket where you could adjust them with a screwdriver if you were willing to dig into that little notch in the pickguard a bit). The truss rod access notch with the T-Bar tool that Fender employs on their (1995 to now) American Standard P and J basses is one of the best truss rod systems out there (along with the Ernie Ball Music Man truss rod "wheel" system), IMHO. Having to take the neck off to adjust the truss rod makes a relatively straight forward maintenance activity a real pain in the arse. * It also can lead to stripped neck mounting holes, chipped finish in and around the neck pocket in the case of a tight neck/neck pocket fit and frayed string wrappings if the neck has to be removed and reinstalled too many times (particularly by a cheapskate, hack, knows almost enough to be dangerous DIY repair guy like me). My American Standard P necks have been pretty darn stable for me, but on the rare occasions that they do need a tweak, that T-Bar tool can do the finest of adjustments with no muss & no fuss. I've been known to file a truss rod access slot on my own Fender bodies & pickguards when the neck sits high enough in the pocket where I can DIY it with a simple circular file but have also had a pro do it for me when a substantial slot was required that was beyond my meager skill level and tool ownership.

* I have a bass buddy (who's actually a pretty skilled luthier) who considers removing the neck to adjust the truss rod some kind of "manly" right of passage thing to do and has been known to tease me about routing truss rod access slots in my basses. Life can be a struggle ... I'll take "easy peasy lemon squeezy" any time I can get it. ;^)
 
Last edited:
  • Like
Reactions: petrus61
What I meant was that's pretty much what Squier does - concentrates on mass-producing a narrower range of models at lower prices. TB has already had this conversation, but to rehash it, I don't buy the idea that the variety of Fender's models has anything to do with either their quality or their price, because they're largely mix-and-match from a pretty standard pool of existing components. The folks on the assembly line are still doing pretty much the same jobs, just that on Wednesday you're putting the regular single-coils in those Jazz bodies and Thursday you'll be putting noiseless in. The hardware guys are putting Schaller bridges in on Mondays and BAII's on Tuesdays. Not that big of a difference, and not much impact on quality or cost of production. Quality control guys still have the same checklist to run through in their inspections. It's not like the car companies, where keeping a low-selling model in production means stocking an inventory of components that you can't use in any other cars. I suspect that cutting models would just send more people like the OP who don't see the EXACT set of features they want in a production model off to look at G&L or Carvin or whomever.

What I find ironic about these threads, which we seem to get on a monthly basis or so, is that they ALWAYS involve a price component. The person basically wants a custom bass for their individual preferences, but at mass-produced prices. He could easily get what he wants from Carvin for $1000 or so, but he wants Fender to do it for $600.

Yeah, thank you too for reading my mind. Actually, Fender not having the right elements in a bass sends me to my shop, and I build one. See that bass in my Avatar? Mine. And I have been down the custom road, and I specifically do NOT want anything custom or fancy about this. I just want Fender to take the pasrts they've already got and mix them a little differently. They do it all the time on the guitar side, and no one can tell a bit of difference.

Because the Squier P5 is such a POS (I had one, for about 5 minutes), and i find the Amer Standard P5 pricey and overkill for what i want, methinks it's time for Fender to expand the Mexi line to include a P5 anyway. and add a PJ while they're at it. It's a standard. Not that big a deal. Program the CNC machine for an additional pickup and on Thursday, that's what it does.

Alternately, and this is probably easier - take a Mexi Jazz Deluxe and put in a 5-string P-bass pickup. Done. Makes lots of people happy.

Where I'm coming from is that the PJ is very much a standard fixture in the bass playing world, and Fender kind of ignores it. Every now and again they have a special edition that has some cool stuff, but I don't want that. Contrary to what you think I don't really want anything so specific. Just a mid-priced PJ5 . From existing parts. Something I can walk into GC and buy off the rack if I need to - which is an interesting proposition, as considering I tour a bit, if something happens, I'd like to be able to do that.

Anyway, what's the big deal? Just apply what has become a defacto standard under the Fender badge.
 
I'd ask Fender to bring back the Boxer PJ-535... with the angled pickups. GAS'ing for one of those.

Beyond incredibly unlikely! That wasn't an FMIC design, but a Fender-Japan/Kanda-Shokai creation. I wouldn't be surprised if FMIC had to negotiate and/or pay to keep the Aerodyne a part of their stable when they took over operations in Japan.

Speaking of the Almighty 'Dyne, Fender-Japan used to make a five-string, P/J Aerodyne Jazz bass. I'll have to see if current management still produces it, but I'm gonna guess they don't.
 
This, in other colours (and ideally with different electronics options):

6be2bc3328c86326f0cf49dd67251251.jpg
 
Fantastic. Name, model, picture, something? Just to be clear, P/Js don't count. A Jazz base with a Precision pup, two knobs, yeah. I have a Lakland 44-64 Custom in that configuration. I saw one (1) '79 Precision with a factory-installed Jazz neck for sale here recently. But nothing else. If I'm looking in the wrong places, I'd love to be corrected.

'79 Precision with a factory-installed Jazz neck for sale here recently

FWIW. I took note because it's odd....and it made me realize how much I don't like Jazz bodies. Because I'm shopping for a P/J....no difference with this except the body shape, which makes no difference to the sound and none to the playability unless you need to play sitting down. Still? Wouldn't consider this.
 
  1. What would I like to see from Fender (and, from Squier, too, as lon as they've come up)?
Well, to start with - here is what I can get:
1. Fender-
- American Standard P-Bass in Black;
- American Standard P-Bass in 3 Tone Burst;
- American Standard Jazz Bass in Black:
- American Standard Jazz Bass in 3 Tone Burst.
2. Squier -
- Modified Jazz Bass in Black;
- Modified Jazz Bass in 3 Tone Burst.
And that's the whole list. No other models; no other colors; no road worns; no signature models - nothing. Why so few? The usual reason - 'cause I'm a lefty. So, what do I want from them? After being treated like a red-headed step child? I want them to pound sand for a while; then, the entire corporation can take a long walk off a short pier. I have one Fender ('78 P-Bass), and one is enough for me... :)
 
I agree they should make a 5 string P/J. The P5's are very cool but the old deluxe P's were one of my favorite Fender basses. The upper level MIM fender's I've played have been great.

Can't you guys hot-rod the P5's to PJ's? That would give you the ability to reverse the P and/or decide where to put the J and other groovy stuff.
That's part of the fun with Fenders--at least for me--you get a stock whatever and make it your own.
 
Last edited: