• TalkBass has been independent since 1998. Add your voice.
    Create a free account to reply to discussions, view embedded media, and browse with fewer display ads.
    Join freeLog in
    Want zero display ads or expanded classifieds tools? Compare plans.

What I wish Fender would make...

Why do people make threads about the largest mass-production bass companies making custom-spec instruments? That's what custom builders are for! People like Carvin can make custom instruments for less than some US-made Fenders cost, and expecting those custom specs on mid-low end instruments is just crazy.

Indeed. Who knows, we may someday see Fender try the model the OP is asking for. But if Fender hasn't gone and run an MIM PJ 5er, one suspects that they're not feeling demand in the public sufficient to support sales of an MIM PJ 5er. Browsing the MF bass listings in the $500-750 range, there are precisely two models with that configuration: the Yamaha BB425x, and the Ibanez SR655 (listed twice by MF for different colors - why do they do that?). In lower price ranges, there's the ESP LTD B-55 and, oh look, Squier does make a PJ 5er - in a VM Jag model. [Invalid or Expired Link Removed]
 
Fender should stop duplicating that stupid truss rod adjustment design where you need to take the neck off, does not matter if is period correct, it is something that should have never existed.

As a luthier, I actually prefer these because they effectively adjust the relief from the nut all the way to the last fret. The ones that are adjustable from the headstock don't run all the way to the end of the neck, so sometimes we end up with weird diversions or other issues at the last couple of frets, especially if they've just been improperly set up by the guy at GC. It's nitpicky, but it makes some set ups less frustrating.

So in short, what they need to make is a truss rod adjustable from the headstock that still runs all the way to the end of the neck :)
 
  • Like
Reactions: petrus61
Personally I think a 5 string PJ is easy to make from fender style parts. You get to decide colors and harware.

Yeah, I would think you could still do this for equal to or less than an MIM. FWIW - I agree, to the extent that a P/J 5-string has become something between a trend and a standard. Fender might do it one day.
 
Last edited:
  • Like
Reactions: Freightshaker
Fender should stop duplicating that stupid truss rod adjustment design where you need to take the neck off, does not matter if is period correct, it is something that should have never existed.
My Luthier would disagree with you! He HATES allen wrench truss rod adjusters. The big fat screw on the heel of the neck is a way better (i.e. less easy to mess up) method.

I honestly don't think it's that big of a problem...I mean....how often to you adjust the relief on your neck?
 
  • Like
Reactions: petrus61
As a luthier, I actually prefer these because they effectively adjust the relief from the nut all the way to the last fret. The ones that are adjustable from the headstock don't run all the way to the end of the neck, so sometimes we end up with weird diversions or other issues at the last couple of frets, especially if they've just been improperly set up by the guy at GC. It's nitpicky, but it makes some set ups less frustrating.

So in short, what they need to make is a truss rod adjustable from the headstock that still runs all the way to the end of the neck :)

This. I very much prefer the heel adjust and have zero problems with it on my American Std. Though it rarely needs an adjustment, it's easy peasy with the 3/16 T-handle. The reissue models aren't as convenient, but they're reissues and really aren't that tough to work with when done correctly and with care. Also, I just think it looks better. I can imagine Fender some day offering a "best of both worlds" model, that has a nitro finish and retro appointments but with a heel access like the AmStd's have.