they look cool and the chip dig'm
Chips..... I dip'm. ......I don't look cool though....
TalkBass has been independent since 1998. Add your voice.
Create a free account to reply to discussions, view embedded media, and browse with fewer display ads.
Join free Log in
Want zero display ads or expanded classifieds tools? Compare plans.
they look cool and the chip dig'm
The P bass is an Opinel, pure simplicity and practicality, impossible to ruin and easy to use and maintain, and useful everywhere.
Because I have a real onewhy do bass players love P basses so much?
Finally, it has been said. Whether this was tongue-in-cheek or not, Amen.RIC is better
Guys, we're TalkBass! If he wants say something about a guitar, let him go over to TalkGuitar and get killed. You folks over here at TB are too much. May we all just come together like the unibrow Al B. Sure had back in the day and discuss P-basses instead.@kbr, I am sorry. I am the reason many of the posts became about guitars. I did not know there was going to be so much "tele love" on a bass forum.
To everyone who has love for the tele: Did not mean to offend telecaster players. The tele has its sound, my original reply was about usefullnes in in all music, versatality if you like. Ive seen people play country on a les paul, and people play metal with a stratocaster. All guitars can be used in all music. If you said to someone: "Im in need for a guitar that i can use for the three cover bands im in. I play everything from Alice Cooper to Natalie Cole. What one guitar would you recomend?" Most likely, no guitar player would recommend the telecaster. Telecasters are cool in the right hands with its iconic sound, but it is its iconic sound.
The last I heard a phrase like that was in South Carolina, was purple, and knocked me on my ass. If you know, you understand. ;-)liquid Jesus
1. P basses are known for having wide necks and then you got a 5 string on top of that, what did you expect?After almost 14 years of bass playing, I finally got around to getting my first P bass. I opted for a U.S. Fender American Standard Precision V. After a few days, I'm kind of hating this bass. While it's not terrible, it isn't that great either. It's not as deep/clear sounding as my other basses, the neck is appropriate for Major League Baseball, and it doesn't record nearly as well as my other basses. I thought to myself, "Maybe it's a dud?" I went down to Guitar Center and found out my bass is largely representative of how they sound / feel. So, I ask you; why do bass players love P basses so much?
I definitely agree with this. I see people posting all the time here saying "If you only own one bass it should be a fender blah blah blah". Most players aren't doing paid session work so its irrelevant. You should play whatever you like. There are way more basses than just ps. Actually, I don't even see p basses that often when I go out to shows. Don't get me wrong, they've been used on a lot of great recordings and sound good, but by no means are they the only bass that sounds good. On another note, after seeing the ghost-build thread and looking more into it myself, it wouldn't surprise me if a lot of those great recording artists weren't using actual fender p basses anyway.....but get out of this mindset and stop listening to all this "A P-Bass is all you need" garbage because that mantra will vary from the needs/wants of each individual player so Im gonna' call BS as I see it....... $.02, YMMV"
You just verified a theory I had about my passive Jazz bass. I'm finally finding a tone I'm happy with (tone at 10, bridge pup around 5, neck pup around 6/7/8), but it's still missing that Umph. A preamp may be the key.And there's a reason why so many of them need a pre-amp... to get a more acceptable tone, bass frequencies need to be boosted.
Now I wonder how the band would have sounded on their heyday records with the precision instead...
If I remember correctly, the first album (the one with John Rutsey) was recorded with his Precision.......His P-Bass had an extra J-Pickup mounted right at the bridge......After the recording in the throes of a *** momemt of his life, he hacked off the cutaways into a gawd-ugly teardrop shape on acid and modified the headstock and he had said the mods ruined the sound of the bass
![]()
I used to think that, but find it's not quite correct. Not boosted, but buffered. The same is true of all passive instruments running a cable. It's a capacitance thing. Having said that, a P-bass with a pre or buffer might be too bright, taking away from the midrange goodness of the P.And there's a reason why so many of them need a pre-amp... to get a more acceptable tone, bass frequencies need to be boosted.
Not sure what this means (I'm not very tech savvy by any means). Mine goes straight into a tube amp that, most nights, is being run with just a slight boost in the mids. It's not lacking in the low end - that's for dang sure.I used to think that, but find it's not quite correct. Not boosted, but buffered. The same is true of all passive instruments running a cable. It's a capacitance thing. Having said that, a P-bass with a pre or buffer might be too bright, taking away from the midrange goodness of the P.
I sort of agree with this - it gives an amazingly solid fundamental tone with limited tone shaping. But what I've really come to love is how expressive they are. Playing up near the neck, over the pickup or near the bridge; softer touch or more aggressive attack; maybe a small tweak here and there with the tone knob - all bring out different nuances. It's all PBass, I suppose but I really enjoy coaxing all those tones out of it.The P bass is an anachronism. It's a 1 trick pony, but what a trick. It's all you need for 90% of bass playing, even today, nearly 70 years later.