• TalkBass has been independent since 1998. Add your voice.
    Create a free account to reply to discussions, view embedded media, and browse with fewer display ads.
    Join freeLog in
    Want zero display ads or expanded classifieds tools? Compare plans.

What would have happened?

GretschWretch

Supporting Member
Dec 27, 2013
12,451
25,121
East Central Alabama
if John Hall had not given Paul McCartney a Rickenbacker bass? In Macca's early Beatles phase he was very frugal with his pounds, shillings and ounces. Would he just have stayed with the Hofner? Would he have added to his stable? If so, with what? His choices would have been limited only to what was readily available in the sixties.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Wyrdlow
if John Hall had not given Paul McCartney a Rickenbacker bass? In Macca's early Beatles phase he was very frugal with his pounds, shillings and ounces. Would he just have stayed with the Hofner? Would he have added to his stable? If so, with what? His choices would have been limited only to what was readily available in the sixties.
He kinda did stick with the Hofner, in the Get Back documentary they show them trying to talk Paul into using the Rickenbacker and he stuck with the Hofner.
 
if John Hall had not given Paul McCartney a Rickenbacker bass? In Macca's early Beatles phase he was very frugal with his pounds, shillings and ounces. Would he just have stayed with the Hofner? Would he have added to his stable? If so, with what? His choices would have been limited only to what was readily available in the sixties.

Someone would have probably given him a Fender.

Fender gave him a Fender…
IMG_8885.jpeg
IMG_8884.jpeg
 
McCartney would probably have ended up endorsing some British instrument. Given the Beatles use of Vox products Vox seems like the obvious choice.
With the passing of Brian Epstein, the handshake agreement with Vox fizzled. The desirability of Vox gear in general was diminishing by ‘67; the company was beset by business woes, and they were being usurped by Marshall and all who came in after them. Amp-wise, the Fabs were already dabbling with Selmer and Fender in the studio, not to mention the dual Strats on “Nowhere Man”.
 
If Hall hadn't given the Beatles instruments Vox would have had an opening before Epstein's death.
How do you figure that? Before they exploded, even in the UK, Lennon had already picked up on, and was happy with, a short scale Rickenbacker guitar, inspired by a European harmonica idol of his, Toots Theilemans, who doubled on one. George was enamored of Gretsch guitars, due to his admiration of country and rockabilly players. The unusual sight of a foreign band, let alone a phenomenon like the Beatles, using Rics certainly spurred the company to seize the day and ply them with instruments, with George especially getting onboard with the 12-string(inspiring Roger McGuinn). But by late ‘65 or so, the Rics fell by the wayside in favor of primarily Epiphone, with Paul using his Ric only in the studio for the longest time. Vox instruments, which were not that well made, held little appeal to them, they just used the amps(and organ).
If you take a survey of some of the other British bands of the time, while they may have initially appeared with Phantoms, Teardrops, and the like, those disappeared pretty quickly when they were able to afford/aquire American instruments. Wyman hung in there with his bass, which was a signature model, but he would still trade off with the Framus until he settled on the Mustang for a while. While Brian Jones put the Teardrop on the map, he was using all sorts of other stuff as well.
 
Last edited:
  • Like
Reactions: Wyrdlow
One thing is sure: Paul never liked thick necks => no P bass on his "have to play" list!


Wise

Explain this, then…
IMG_8902.jpeg


Not to mention that the Yamaha he did use was essentially a trickle-down P…
IMG_8905.jpeg


As for Wal, I had a 4-string at one time, couldn’t deal with the V-shape profile. Not P-like, but it wasn’t exactly thin, so a 5-string wouldn’t be either…
IMG_8903.jpeg
 

Latest posts