• TalkBass has been independent since 1998. Add your voice.
    Create a free account to reply to discussions, view embedded media, and browse with fewer display ads.
    Join freeLog in
    Want zero display ads or expanded classifieds tools? Compare plans.

What's a high quality microphone?.....Shure SM58???

Don't know if it is too late or not but anyway, the Audix OM5 is a LOT better in the gain before feedback department (about 9db difference!!!) than the 58 or Beta 58 (its shure equivalent) and sounds REALLY good (better than either in my opinion). You can pick them up everyday at GC for $99.00 The Audix I5 is a better mic than the 57 or Beta 57 (and a TON of others) and can be gotten at GC for $79.00. These mics along with an Audix OM 7 and a few Audix drum mics have replaced most of my old "standbys" that I have been using for the past 25 years or so!! Very good products PERIOD!! ESPECIALLY for the money.....

Peace,

T
Smart man here. Look into Audix (OM5, OM7) mics. They are great, affordable and are designed to eliminate/deter feedback. Shure SM58's may be industry standards but there are better mics out there.
 
Like everyone is saying - the SM58 (not the BETA 58) is the industry standard and has been for many, many years. Very good, very solid workhorse, almost indestructible. That said, I prefer the ND767 and IME have less feedback issues with the EV, BUT, like someone else said, I'm not convinced that just changing a vocal mic is going to fix your feedback issues, certainly won't hurt and may be the best starting point.

Good luck!


Thanks for the responses. Perhaps the SM58 vs the
Electro-Voice ND767 is like comparing a Fender to a Sadowsky.

Feedback control is really our main issue. It seems the SM58, from what I have read, does not fair so well in this regard. However, the
Electro-Voice ND767 is apparently much better at rejecting feedback. Anyone have any experience with the


Electro-Voice ND767?

 
I won't sing live out of anything except a 58 if I can help it. Just the plain SM-58, not the Beta 58. The Beta 58 is too trebly for me.

I thought I was the only one who felt this way! I love the SM58. I keep one in my gear box in case the sound company or band I'm working with has anything else. The Beta gets on my nerves. The only other mic I have ever really liked was a Rhode vocal mic, but I don't recall the model.
 
hard to beat a 58. But I like the Sennheiser E35 better than the 58. Same price range
but the Senn seems to cut thru a live mix better and has fantastic feedback rejection.
IF you want to step it up one notch look at the Shure Beta 87....they have equally fantastic feedback rejection and sound much better than the 57/58 series mics. I keep a 58 and a Beta 87 in my gig bag and choose which to use based on the sound guy....yes some sound guys don't have a clue so for those I use the 58. But one of the bands I play in uses E35's exclusively for all the vocals.
 
Having recommended Audix mics, I will say, I own several SM58's and have never paid full new price for them. I see them on Craigslist all the time. Most I paid was $60 dang near brand new with bag and clip. Lowest I paid was $40. Dented wind screens are easily replaceable and cheap around $6.

It's easy to push out dents with the end of a broom handle. You have to be careful about buying Shure mics off CL. I had a chance to buy a bunch of Beta58As for $60 apiece. Sounded too good to be true. It was. They were Chinese fakes, and not even good ones. The was from the same guy I had bought a couple legit SM57s off of. (How's that for a double hanging preposition?)
 
My band is looking for a good quality microphone. The owner of the rehearsal studio said that if we got a good quality mic it will solve alot of the feedback issues we are having with his PA. We are a five piece band and cant get enough vol. on the vocals without going into feedback territory.

He highly recommends the Shure SM58, but then some reviews on Harmony Central dont think highly of it. What's been your experience with it? Is there a better mic within a similar price range available?

thanks!

1. Your instruments are up too loud
2. You need to EQ better
3. You need to watch speaker and mic placement
4. I guarantee you, your instruments are up too loud
 
Thanks for the responses. Perhaps the SM58 vs the
Electro-Voice ND767 is like comparing a Fender to a Sadowsky.

Feedback control is really our main issue. It seems the SM58, from what I have read, does not fair so well in this regard. However, the
Electro-Voice ND767 is apparently much better at rejecting feedback. Anyone have any experience with the


Electro-Voice ND767?


My band's guitarist/sound man swears by the 767. He convinced the singer and drummer to buy that model, and when I dropped and broke my Sennheiser a few months ago, he suggested that I purchase a 367 (EV describes it as being tailored for the female voice). I was skeptical, but since it was about the same price as my old SM58, I bought it. It definitely sounds better to my ears. As a plus, when a drunken woman knocked it over onto a hard floor, it didn't break.
 
My band's guitarist/sound man swears by the 767. He convinced the singer and drummer to buy that model, and when I dropped and broke my Sennheiser a few months ago, he suggested that I purchase a 367 (EV describes it as being tailored for the female voice). I was skeptical, but since it was about the same price as my old SM58, I bought it. It definitely sounds better to my ears. As a plus, when a drunken woman knocked it over onto a hard floor, it didn't break.

The EV 767 seems to be a much hotter mic than the Shure. My wife sings through that mic, and swears by it. I am using some old Audio Technica ATM61HEs that I bought in 1994. It works for me, and I also have a couple different EV and Sennheiser condensers. I don't have a single Shure mic. I think my wife has an ancient 58 that she uses only as an emergency backup.

There are as many different mics as different basses, and as many reasons to try them out as your individual singing style is different than each other's individual playing styles. Your voice; your tone; these are all yours alone, and it's worth trying out some good hypercardoid mics for stage.
 
Since it hasn't been mentioned, I thought I would chime in with a question/suggestion.

How far away from the mic is your vocalist? If she is singing softly, generally speaking, she needs to be no farther than a hand's width away from the screen, or else there is no mic that will solve the problem. Nose to the hose, baby!:D
 
dunno about all of this. in one of my bands, we use some nady crap i bought "3 for $49" from gc. we play loud. we play in a concrete and cinderblock basement. we use a pair of kustom pw50's for vox (cheap powered 2x4" boxes). we hear the vocals fine and never get feedback. seems to me it's a bunch of bs and the OP (nice zombie thread resurrection btw) or anyone having this problem should just do everything wrong, maybe it'll work out for you like it has for us.

but really, we shouldn't (a) be able to hear the vox with 100 total watts through 4 4" speakers (b) have the speakers behind us (c) use the cheapest mics in the world (d) play unreasonably loud with such a wimpy pa (e) play in a basement surrounded by unfinished cinderblock with a concrete floor and no obstructions.... but we do and everything is fine (except maybe our hearing). i couldn't even guess as to what the op's group is (was) doing wrong.
 
The 57s and 58s have been around a very long time, and sound engineers know well how to use them. Because of their consistent performance and reasonable price, they have become a standard, but they are far from the best mics.

I have an old AKG D1000E that just kills the Shures, and as mentioned, the Audix mic line is superb updated technology and outperforms most all other similar mics.
 
As an eBay Associate, TalkBass may earn a commission from qualifying purchases.

Latest posts