• TalkBass has been independent since 1998. Add your voice.
    Create a free account to reply to discussions, view embedded media, and browse with fewer display ads.
    Join freeLog in
    Want zero display ads or expanded classifieds tools? Compare plans.

What's the difference between the regular sansamp and the 3-channel sansamp?

Regular sansamp-http://www.amazon.com/gp/aw/d/B0002D0EN8/ref=mp_s_a_1?qid=1354245021&sr=8-1&pi=SL75

3-channel sansamp-http://www.amazon.com/gp/aw/d/B0009E6RQS/ref=mp_s_a_1?qid=1354245106&sr=8-2&pi=SL75

I think there has to be some difference, the 3 channel is only like $10 more? Two more channels for $10?
 
Well, if you want to send an "uneffected" signal to the PA system and an effected signal to your amp, then the regular BDDI can do that.

The PBDDI has two outputs: an XLR and "effected" 1/4 out.

Edit - There could be many applications to having different outputs and many more configurations on a pedalboard.
 
AmpedSilence said:
Well, if you want to send an "uneffected" signal to the PA system and an effected signal to your amp, then the regular BDDI can do that.

The PBDDI has two outputs: an XLR and "effected" 1/4 out.

Edit - There could be many applications to having different outputs and many more configurations on a pedalboard.

So what all do I sacrifice for two more channels?
 
The parallel out is for sending to you stage amp. The effect out is for going to the PA.

The Bass Driver was not designed as an effects box for your amp. It was designed to send an "amp-like" signal to the PA.

But, it sounds awesome going into your amp so if that's how you're using it then the parallel out is moot.
 

Latest posts