FWIW, check around to see if there is any place that repairs Line 6, where I worked, Music Technologies (Bill Thalmann), dropped Line 6, as has most service shops in the DC metro area, because of poor service...
TalkBass has been independent since 1998. Add your voice.
Create a free account to reply to discussions, view embedded media, and browse with fewer display ads.
Join free Log in
Want zero display ads or expanded classifieds tools? Compare plans.
Because he wants to sell you something. He can't sell you what he doesn't have, so he has to come up with an excuse why he doesn't have Line 6. :scowl:
The real reason would have to do with Line 6's distribution policies. It's more likely that he doesn't meet their standards, not the other way around.
that's the case with any modeling or amp sim. they cop the tones but not the feel. however, i'm finding that when you mix the two, you can have your cake and eat it, too. get a good tube amp and use it as a platform for modeling, and while it may not be 100% of the real thing, it's way more satisfying.I always thought that Line 6 stuff sounded great. My brother had a Flextone II that i thought was the mutts nuts. But after seeing a recent gig *, I now realise that they are 'OK'. Sounds fine and pretty good, but compared to a raw tube amp, they aren't as good as you think they are!
* Richie Kotzen gig. Richie and the opening act both used Teles through Cornford MK50s. The other supporting act who went on between them, the guitarist used a Top of the range Line 6 Vetta. His tone was pretty good, he really knew how to get the best from the amp and had obviously spent time tweaking it to get the best tone out of it. If I had only heard him playing that night I wouldn't have been any the wiser. But compared to the raw tones of the Cornfords, there was no competition. The Line 6 was almost 'too' nice, the processing just couldn't reproduce the bite and rawness of a real cranked tube amp.
that's the case with any modeling or amp sim. they cop the tones but not the feel. however, i'm finding that when you mix the two, you can have your cake and eat it, too. get a good tube amp and use it as a platform for modeling, and while it may not be 100% of the real thing, it's way more satisfying.
and an output transformer. but then you'd have a tube amp and it would put the modeling amp makers back to square one. it would be like admitting defeat, and those guys never would and who could blame them?A few manufacturer's have implemented tubes into modelling amps/units. Trouble is, they tend to stick tubes in the pre-amp section. The bite and 'feel' comes from the power amp section, especially in guitar amps. This is where it needs tubes.
and an output transformer. but then you'd have a tube amp and it would put the modeling amp makers back to square one. it would be like admitting defeat, and those guys never would and who could blame them?![]()
I personally agree with the music store. I've always found Line 6 amps to be unreliable and very stagnant tone wise (i know they have all those different settings but IMO every tone is just so processed and digital that it kills it for me) and yes, sometimes they are a tad heavy
Because he wants to sell you something. He can't sell you what he doesn't have, so he has to come up with an excuse why he doesn't have Line 6. :scowl:
The real reason would have to do with Line 6's distribution policies. It's more likely that he doesn't meet their standards, not the other way around.
I want my amp to color my tone a bit. But I don't want to model someone else's tone.
Because he wants to sell you something. He can't sell you what he doesn't have, so he has to come up with an excuse why he doesn't have Line 6. :scowl:
The real reason would have to do with Line 6's distribution policies. It's more likely that he doesn't meet their standards, not the other way around.