And as I recall from history, those kinds of folks were on the wrong side during the Revolutionary War.Some of us are more comfortable being subjects than citizens.
TalkBass has been independent since 1998. Add your voice.
Create a free account to reply to discussions, view embedded media, and browse with fewer display ads.
Join free Log in
Want zero display ads or expanded classifieds tools? Compare plans.
And as I recall from history, those kinds of folks were on the wrong side during the Revolutionary War.Some of us are more comfortable being subjects than citizens.
The availability of guns has no effect on crime rates, so why not err on the side of liberty?
Oh yeah, I forgot. Some of us are more comfortable being subjects than citizens.
And as I recall from history, those kinds of folks were on the wrong side during the Revolutionary War.

Funnily enough this is evidence of a very decadent society. As is obesity, for that matter.
I have never felt safe when people around me carry guns. It reminds me of bad things. If I walked in a restaurant full of armed people or breast-naked girls with guns in their pockets I'd probably go berzerk...
Which is better? All of us carrying guns in order to protect ourselves? Or none of us ever having any access to this sort of protection?
Funnily enough this is evidence of a very decadent society. As is obesity, for that matter.
I have never felt safe when people around me carry guns. It reminds me of bad things.
If I walked in a restaurant full of armed people or breast-naked girls with guns in their pockets I'd probably go berzerk...
Which is better? All of us carrying guns in order to protect ourselves? Or none of us ever having any access to this sort of protection?
What are we discussing here?
).I highlighted the better part. As for your personal fears, most of us do not share them.
I don't feel decadent when I exercise my 2A rights. Not sure how to take that one...?
Nice dig, but how do you figure gun ownership is evidence of decadence.
What kind of 'bad things'? Like puppies being beaten? BTW, there's a difference between carrying a weapon in the open and carrying one concealed - and the difference is that folks who wet themselves when they see firearms don't have to wear a diaper.
What?
![]()
You need proof of gun ownership being evidence of decadence? How worse can it get? You need more than having people being afraid everywhere and carying guns, in order to be convinced that you live in decadence? It seems that people in your country are prepared for a gunslaughter everywhere they stand, drinking coffee, having dinner, having a stroll. A gun is always nearby to protect them, or to harm them. Instead I can go on a stroll without thinking a gun is necessary to protect me. I don't even need my fists. A society where every loafer on the street is a possible offender, to my eyes is a decadent society. A society where people are afraid to walk without the support of a gun is a society far more problematic than what I would dub 'decadent'. And I don't need any more proof for that.
The bad things I was referring to is simply that guns are not toys. You have gun threads on this forum, just like you have 'show of your bass' threads. Having a gun is becoming hip - let alone 'necessary'-, and some people among you show them off saying 'I wouldn't mind shooting somebody with this baby'. Now if this is not decadent, I don't know what the hell is. Puppies being beaten? No. And I don't like the irony. And no, I don't wet myself when I see guns, because I have used one, and I have been in a war, and I have shot people and I have been shot. And I know what it is like, and I can assure you it is not a show off thing, nor a toy. My country, along with other european countries has come a long way to assure personal freedom. With no guns. Your country has the shortest history, when compared to european countries, and you have already reached a point as a society where you don't feel safe anymore, not even when you're strolling (at least not without a gun). People are safer in Bosnia and Herzegovina, or in Montenegro. Because they don't feel threatened all the time. They don't feel like as soon as they walk out the door, some dude is going to come to them and ask them for money and they'll have to show off their new .45 in order to kill this dude.
On a final note, I don't want to convince anyone that all this gun talk is completely decadent and futile. Do as you wish, it is your country, your society and your responsibility. But don't be surprised when you have V-tech or columbine high incidents. And don't be surprised when you learn that you're the only country where this has ever happened so many times.
There are so many things wrong with your post I barely know where to begin. First off, when you look at population, the most dangerous cities in the U.S. have the strictist gun laws, and these cities are safer, statistically then London, Amsterdam, Budapest, and a whole lot of other European "gun free" cities. Secondly, didn't Australia and England resort to disarming the populace after events such as V-tech took place? Plenty of us have been in wars, been shot and shot people, this makes you an authority on nothing. You should worry about greek politics and stay the hell out of American political conversations that you know nothing about and that have nothing to do with you. One of the reasons America is the most powerful country on the planet is because of our constitution (including the 2nd amendment) You have nothing to say about what freedoms U.S. citizens should be allowed to enjoy. Our forefathers left Europe a couple hundred years ago and anybody who wants a return to European style government should move back there and Europeans who don't like the fact that we , as Americans, enjoy greater freedom than they do, should stay there. The U.N., or anybody who is not a U.S. citizen, has absolutely no buisness concerning themselves with internal, domestic United States policies. Spread your ******** in your own country.