I think we've split off into 2 completely different conversations and 2 different applications of the word luck.
What I'm seeing as the whole "luck is opportunity+preparation" point is applied to situations like the CB. Where he didn't become recognized because he just happened to be standing in the right place at the right time. He had opportunities that he was prepared for and took advantage of. Kinda like when you come from nothing, beg for a job sweeping floors and 20 yrs later you're running the company. Then people tell you "you're lucky" because you have a nice house and money in the bank. It's not "survivorship bias". It's insulting when you know how hard you've worked to have what you have and people haven't the slightest idea what you've been through and had to overcome to be where you are. Then they call you lucky, as if it fell out of the sky, or someone just handed it all to you just because you had the right eye color. The assumption always seems to be that if someone has something, it was due to luck, or some type of privilege.
Certainly wasn't the case for me.
An act like the Monkeys? Sure, I could skip the semantics and agree that a few no talent hacks got lucky, because they were successful and didn't do much to earn it. I wouldn't call a guy like CB "lucky". If he was faking it and still successful, I'd say he got a little lucky. Although, being a fraud is also hard work, but sometimes you need a little luck to get away with it.
My point is, there are times when you are a victim of circumstances that you have no control over. And there are times when you have control of a circumstance and it's outcome is based solely on the choices you make. It's not all one or the other. Life has both.