• TalkBass has been independent since 1998. Add your voice.
    Create a free account to reply to discussions, view embedded media, and browse with fewer display ads.
    Join freeLog in
    Want zero display ads or expanded classifieds tools? Compare plans.

which do you prefer and why may i ask

ottisiscool

Guest
Jul 18, 2018
8
11
75
texas
Disclosures
Jesus Rulz.
Would you rather use and why
maxresdefault.jpg
 
Two different but effective ways to shape your tone. Graphic EQs (the one on the left) are nice because it's easy to see at a glance how you've shaped your tone. Parametric EQs are more precise, but more complicated: you have to rely on your ears rather than your eyes, but that can be a good thing.

The GE7 lets you adjust seven different frequencies at fixed points, the PQ3B/PQ4 lets you adjust three frequencies at variable points.

As noted, there's no right or wrong. Go with whichever seems like it'll be more effective for you.
 
I really love parametric EQ's but can see how they are not for everyone and not for every situation, but for experimenting/recording they are far superior.

You don't even need a fully Para EQ either, just parametric mids can open up a lot of possibilities. But some of the fancy ones like the Empress Para EQ seem hard to beat.
 
I like this. It's on my GAS list. Can zero in on frequencies that could be beneficial to your sound. IME, Para EQ seems more precise, as mentioned feedback control. Graphic EQ seems more like a general on/off type of effect.

b4ylpt8sqx1bea8xkymn.jpg
 
Different tools for different jobs.

Graphic EQ for overall sonic spectrum shaping and simple problem fixing.

Parametric EQ for surgically precise adjustments.

I own and use both types of outboard EQ. (Source Audio Programmable Graphic EQ/Broughton Audio Parametric EQ)
 
  • Like
Reactions: bholder