• TalkBass has been independent since 1998. Add your voice.
    Create a free account to reply to discussions, view embedded media, and browse with fewer display ads.
    Join freeLog in
    Want zero display ads or expanded classifieds tools? Compare plans.

Which flats for which bass?

Chromes or Sadowsky's for my J Bass?


  • Total voters
    11
Hi All,

I've caught the bug for flats and just put some Chromes on my parts P (CV body, MIM neck, Gotoh 201 bridge, SPB-1). I'm liking those so much, I reached out to bassstringsonline (Jason was great to deal with) for some light Sadowsky Black Label flats which are being shipped. My other bass is a bone stock 2008 MIA Jazz. Jason was adamant to not string the Sadowskys through the body of the J, and I'm OK with that. Any opinion if I should transfer the Chromes (light gauge also) to the J and go through the body, or just leave them on the P and put the Sadowsky's top loaded on the J? I play blues and classic rock in a pick-up three piece. Just trying to get a feel for which strings better complement which bass. Your opinions are appreciated!

Here's a visual just for grins.

Shaun

4f761ce2-9303-4c0e-8e4d-9ee4190395bc_zps5e3b7f22.jpg
 
  • Like
Reactions: LUCE
Jason knows his stuff. But if your G string ends up twangy compared to the rest of the strings, it is small and flexible enough it might be worth trying the string through to see if that puts a little more down force on the G saddle and helps with twang.
 
I have Sadowskys top-loaded on my P and Fender 9050L through the body on my Jazz.

Sadowskys would not be my choice on a Jazz. They are a bit dark and have thump but work better on a P, IMO. I didn't care for Chromes on either bass.

If and when I ever change strings on the Jazz, I'll probably go top loaded. Even pressing the strings down at the saddles to create a good witness point, the through-body seemed to give me higher action for a long time on the Jazz. It does seem to have settled in a bit more lately. Maybe I did it wrong. But that's a tight angle for those strings to bend around at the saddle. I can't hear any advantage in tone or sustain with the strings through the body, so for me it's easier to go top-loaded.
 
Last edited:
  • Like
Reactions: michael_t
Well, I got the Sadowskys in and put them on my P. I moved the Chromes over to the J Bass and went through the body. The majority opinion was to top-load the chromes on the J, but I went through the body for the simple reason one of the ferrules was loose and I preferred to string through as opposed to mess with the ferrule. I was able to intonate both basses without any problems. I really like the results! The J is tuned to standard pitch and sounds great. The P is tuned a half step low as that is where the band plays and I am really digging the Sadowskys--yep, plenty of "thump." If the Chromes protest going through the body of my J, I would seriously consider Sadowskys for the J as well.

As an aside, Jason at Bassstringsonline was great to deal with. Very responsive to my questions and very prompt shipping. As another aside, I got some LaBella flats for a new Squire Mustang and proceeded to ruin the A string when the fabric un-wrapped on the tuner end when I tried to re-string it. That was not a cheap mistake. Thanks everyone for your opinions. Have a great Sunday!

Shaun
 
While I don't move roundwounds between basses I found that flats last so long that sooner or later I'm moving them between basses. So, I stopped stringing them through the body. Didn't seem to make a difference in sound, but definitely made my strings happier.
 

Latest posts