Neither.
![]()
I hate those on a Fender-esque headstock. They're okay on something like an MTD, but they just look wimpy otherwise.
not crazy about the way they feel, either.
TalkBass has been independent since 1998. Add your voice.
Create a free account to reply to discussions, view embedded media, and browse with fewer display ads.
Join free Log in
Want zero display ads or expanded classifieds tools? Compare plans.
Neither.
![]()
Clover all the way for me. The lollipops look like they aren't finished, almost like a blank before being cut out into the clover (or some other) shape.
It depends on the bass: whatever is "in character" for the particular model looks best to me.
Clover all the way for me. The lollipops look like they aren't finished, almost like a blank before being cut out into the clover (or some other) shape.
It's great to have the choice, which one I like depends on the bass.
The tuner side of this headstock was trimmed 1/4 inch to get more stem showing. Sort of a vintage reverse look.
![]()
![]()

It does depend on the headstock. The more angular headstocks seem to look nicer with the Y tuners and the rounded Fender headstock with the cloverleafs. Lollipops can be for the nonconformists.![]()
![]()
There is a difference between being non-conforming and cool.I guess I'm non-conforming...I've always thought lollipops were pretty cool.
. . . .
I am currently lusting after an Alleva Coppolo and they use the lollipop tuners, so I agree that lollipops can be cool even if not always the best choice for a given headstock.There is a difference between being non-conforming and cool.I might add that the statement was meant to be funny. You did notice the smilies, didn't you?
![]()