• TalkBass has been independent since 1998. Add your voice.
    Create a free account to reply to discussions, view embedded media, and browse with fewer display ads.
    Join freeLog in
    Want zero display ads or expanded classifieds tools? Compare plans.

Which phrase annoys you the most?

Which phrase annoys you the most?

  • Cut through the mix

  • Sustain (in any context)

  • Maple or Rosewood

  • Hi mass bridge

  • P or J

  • Carrots

  • Carrots for carrots sake!


Results are only viewable after voting.
"Road worn", "relic" and "relic-ing", and so forth.

I treat my instruments like family treasures. I keep them clean and polished. At most, they might get a few scratches in their time with me; when I sell a bass, I can honestly say it's in great shape. How the hell some people can beat their basses into a dirty, dented, missing paint condition that looks like they were used as a shovel in an archaeological dig, much less why anybody would want to do so deliberately and prematurely, is completely beyond me.
 
Last edited:
Just a question - you don't feel that holding the string against the neck at the first and last frets, and various combinations in between, amounts to confirming that it's ruler flat? Yes, it could be convex, but we'll assume here that people are smart enough to have checked that. Flat means that it may not be perfectly smooth, but it does mean that the overall surface is the same height at all tested points, which can then be smoothed to plot a chart of the neck's curvature, which would show it as being as flat as if drawn with a ruler.

Ruler flat is a real thing. My fretless is ruler flat - confirmed and tested by string and by, shockingly enough, a ruler. Ok, a professional straight edge for graphic design that's a meter long, but a ruler all the same.

I'm not disputing your dislike for the term LoL, just wondering why it bothers, since it actually is true in some people's cases?
Oh wait. I GET IT NOW. You meant that it's redundant to call something ruler flat, as opposed to just flat. Duh - See, I shouldn't post without coffee.

:-)
 
Cutting through the mix is a good phrase because so many basses and their rigs do not.
For decades I and others have watched bass players and it is infuriating when you watch the hands move but cannot hear the notes because they do NOT cut through the mix and are lost in the noise.

This is the reason I hated Fender basses for decades until I came to the US and learned that it was actually the amps that were overrated and inadequate. Fenders can produce their recorded sounds quite nicely in modern amps especially with sealed speaker cabinets and 12" speakers.

Another one that is bitched about unjustly is the tone is in the fingers. That too is true and provable any time you get a few, (more than 1) bass players together to play the same instrument and amp. They will not sound the same because of finger technique, experience level and the specific place the finders pluck the string.

Jack Bruce and Andy Frazer used Marshall amps and Cabs and Gibson EB3's of early vintage. Not the same instrument or amp but the same type and their sounds are not even close and are as far away as their playing style and technique. If they played the same rig, I bet they still sound like themselves.
 
Maybe or maybe not related to bass:
“That’s what I’m talkin’ ‘bout!”
“Let’s do this!!”
“My bad!”
“That’s what she said!”
“Delish” for delicious....
..and every once in a while I will hear someone say “psych!!!”.....guess they are trying to hang on to their 80s “hipness”!
 
  • Like
Reactions: Sixgunn
"Road worn", "relic" and "relicing", and so forth.

I treat my instruments like family treasures. I keep them clean and polished. At most, they might get a few scratches in their time with me; when I sell a bass, I can honestly say it's in great shape. How the hell some people can beat their basses into a dirty, dented, missing paint condition that looks like they were used as a shovel in an archaeological dig, much less why anybody would want to do so deliberately and prematurely, is completely beyond me.
Right!? 100%.
That is bound to set somebody off.
 
  • Like
Reactions: dkelley
It bothers me slightly to read that each and every bass in stock at some stores is “super resonate.” Resonant is the adjective form, and how do you not have any basses that are not extraordinarily resonant? Not even one? Some players want thud!
 
Last edited: