• TalkBass has been independent since 1998. Add your voice.
    Create a free account to reply to discussions, view embedded media, and browse with fewer display ads.
    Join freeLog in
    Want zero display ads or expanded classifieds tools? Compare plans.

Which Rolling Stones concert would you rather attend?

Bill is a decent bass player, and the 4th best bassist to ever play with the Stones:

1) Darryl
2) Keith
3) Ronnie
4) Bill

A good finish (some good company there), but missed the podium by one spot.

As to which show, if you attend the new one, the band probably won't be drowned out by the screaming crowd. After a tune or so, that would drive me up a tree.
 
Last edited:
Bill is a decent bass player, and the 4th best bassist to ever play with the Stones:

1) Darryl
2) Keith
3) Ronnie
4) Bill

A good finish (some good company there), but missed the podium by one spot.

As to which show, if you attend the new one, the band probably won't be drowned out by the screaming crowd. After a tune or so, that would drive me up a tree.
Add Bill Plumber & Mick Taylor to the bassman list.

Saw The Stones last Oct in Nashville and they tore it up. But I'd loved to have seen a show from the 72 tour.
Mick, Keef, Ronnie.JPG
 
Bill is a decent bass player, and the 4th best bassist to ever play with the Stones:

1) Darryl
2) Keith
3) Ronnie
4) Bill

A good finish (some good company there), but missed the podium by one spot.

As to which show, if you attend the new one, the band probably won't be drowned out by the screaming crowd. After a tune or so, that would drive me up a tree.
Can you point to any Stones recordings that Ronnie played bass on? I obviously know about his work in the Jeff Beck Group. As for Keith vs Bill, they’re different. The only Stones song that in my opinion clearly benefited from Keith on bass was Sympathy.
 
I saw the Stones in 1969 at the Garden in NYC with Mick Taylor. It was a transitional period for them after Brian Jones’ departure and tragic end.

I would have liked to have seen a show of theirs with the original line up. When they were creating the kind of excitement the Beatles and the Dave Clark Five, the Kinks, the Yardbirds, the Animals and others in London were creating at the time. Circa 1962-66.

They communicated a raw vibrant energy before they became formulaic.

All of the wet seats at their local shows attested to its authenticity.
 
Last edited:
True, but at this point I don't think they are doing it for the money. Although it's a nice bonus.

Why do you think they’re doing it? To stay relevant? I sense that drives McCartney. Townshend has said it’s the money. But he says a lot of things.

EDIT: I was just listening to Brian Jones’s sitar part in Paint It Black. They abandoned that kind of experimentation post-Jones.

Much like The Who became The Who 2.0 after Tommy, The Rolling Stones became a different band after Beggar’s Banquet, pre-Exile On Main Street
 
Last edited:

Latest posts