TalkBass has been independent since 1998. Add your voice.
Create a free account to reply to discussions, view embedded media, and browse with fewer display ads.
Join free Log in
Want zero display ads or expanded classifieds tools? Compare plans.
It's not a band. It's the pseudonym of a visual artist.
The reason I think of names that are basically ___________and the_____________, is that they are drawing all the attention to one member, when the rest of the band are regular members who just don't get mentioned. So, even though I liked Tom Petty, I disliked the naming convention that disregarded the assorted Heartbreakers.
That sums up my last day job perfectly.On the down side, the whole "You don't count." level of employment. Very much like being a McDonalds counter person hanging out with the Kroc family, if that makes sense.

Hey Guys -
Basically exactly what the title says. My given name is just way too lame to use as a stage name. So back in the day I'd always be the singer/bassist/lyricist for a band and we'd go by the band name collectively.
That works as long as it's a good collective name for the band. Rush? Good. Journey? Good. Gov't Mule? Still good. anything that includes one person's name, but not everyone's? Bad. So for example: Tom Petty and the Heartbreakers? Fail.
You can also fail with extra credit if you come up with a perfectly good band name and then STILL include stage names for some members, like 1/3 of The Police, or 1/2 of U2. Extra credit points to the Ramones for doing that one right.
The main reason my given name sucks for this kind of situation is that my last name is a common first name. And my first name is a common last name. So for my entire fifty five years of life, well meaning idiots have corrected me when I introduced myself, like they know my name better having just met me than I do having lived with it forever.
I suppose I could use a fake band name for just me, like Uncle Banzai, or Iron and Wine. But that doesn't feel very "me".
Then it hit me, a perfectly awesome stage name that actually re-used part of my own name AND made a nice ironic statement on a black and white cover picture, because it's a mnemonic for all the colors of the spectrum. Roy G Biv.
Yeah. It's taken.
SO frustrated.
ugh....its actually really hard to come up with a band name everyone likes...dunno how many times we've racked our brains tryng to think up something...And when you finally do think of one, make sure nobody else has claimed it and have the phone in your hand to call a lawyer and trademark offices.....because that's how quickly it will be gone if you dont![]()
Hey Guys -
Basically exactly what the title says. My given name is just way too lame to use as a stage name. So back in the day I'd always be the singer/bassist/lyricist for a band and we'd go by the band name collectively.
SO frustrated.
My given name is just way too lame to use as a stage name.
"Never trust a man with two first names". So say's my wife of 32 years.I've lived your story and can empathize. I have the same affliction and I blame my late parents. It was probably cute in the moment but they had no clue......
![]()
The main reason my given name sucks for this kind of situation is that my last name is a common first name. And my first name is a common last name.
It’s always Peoria.Back in the day you could have a local or regional band, and maybe there was another band by the same name on the west coast, and nobody knew or cared. Now, with the great blessing and curse of the inter web, you come up with a great band name, search the web, and somebody in Peoria already has it.
hmmm what about this one takenHey Guys -
Basically exactly what the title says. My given name is just way too lame to use as a stage name. So back in the day I'd always be the singer/bassist/lyricist for a band and we'd go by the band name collectively.
That works as long as it's a good collective name for the band. Rush? Good. Journey? Good. Gov't Mule? Still good. anything that includes one person's name, but not everyone's? Bad. So for example: Tom Petty and the Heartbreakers? Fail.
You can also fail with extra credit if you come up with a perfectly good band name and then STILL include stage names for some members, like 1/3 of The Police, or 1/2 of U2. Extra credit points to the Ramones for doing that one right.
The main reason my given name sucks for this kind of situation is that my last name is a common first name. And my first name is a common last name. So for my entire fifty five years of life, well meaning idiots have corrected me when I introduced myself, like they know my name better having just met me than I do having lived with it forever.
I suppose I could use a fake band name for just me, like Uncle Banzai, or Iron and Wine. But that doesn't feel very "me".
Then it hit me, a perfectly awesome stage name that actually re-used part of my own name AND made a nice ironic statement on a black and white cover picture, because it's a mnemonic for all the colors of the spectrum. Roy G Biv.
Yeah. It's taken.
SO frustrated.
I have been reading the Rush tour history book ("Wandering the Face of the Earth") and there was one gig listed with Rush, Mahogany Rush and Bullrush all on the bill. Wow.I don't think I understand this. You mean it would be bad if, say, you were fronting the Heartbreakers using your own real name?
About cool names already taken, yeah sure, that's frustrating. It must've been nice for people forming bands in the 60s when you could go with something simple like Rush.
Rush is my favorite band, but I have to admit that their band name is nothing special. I bet lots of bands tried to use that name before Rush became generally known.
I didn't know Roygbiv was a band name, but I do know it's a song title by the electronic group Boards of Canada.
If I remember correctly, the decision to put Tom out front and include his name was made by the record label. Tom didn't like it and wanted the band to just be the Heartbreakers. This is a recollection I have from watching a biographical video about him not long after he died, so I might be misremembering.I totally get why Tom had his name out front. It just kinda seems that that would suck if you were Benmont or Mike.
.
At least you were not female and had the label stick your married name everywhere without bothering to ask you what name you'd like to use. I will forever be known in some select circles by a name I only wore for about three years.yeah, what's with that parents-naming-their-children thing? i begged my parents (really lovely people in their own right) not to name me JRA, but: that was my father's name --- so they 'colluded' and began calling me JRA against my will and my better judgment. by the time i cut my first record, it was already 'out there' and i felt i had no choice but to accept it. bummer! i have used a couple of stage names to hide the embarrassment... nay, the stigma.
but if you see a bunch of hits being marketed as "JRA" just know that it isn't me --- i'm here, on TB, even though i'm the real JRA!
per the OP: my brother's name is roy g. biv = so that's already taken! better luck next time!![]()
At least you were not female and had the label stick your married name everywhere without bothering to ask you what name you'd like to use. I will forever be known in some select circles by a name I only wore for about three years.