• TalkBass has been independent since 1998. Add your voice.
    Create a free account to reply to discussions, view embedded media, and browse with fewer display ads.
    Join freeLog in
    Want zero display ads or expanded classifieds tools? Compare plans.

Who LIKES their Wishnevsky, and why?

Lo end PUNCH said:
BASSicly(couldnt resist), it's not so differently than what a lot of luthiers will allow you to do.
Your input is VERY impotant to a custom instrument. If you like the sound, and a lot of people do, then cosmeticly you should want to help with the design flaws that so many Wish owners talk about(if you just HAVE to have one). Hey, Wish gets his share of bad reviews but cats keep buyin' 'em so if someone wants one, why not get one AND get it done right? You could order a Fodera for $4000 plus, no reason at that price to worry about anything, or a Wish for $300 plus with a few flaws. Both are still custom built but the Wish is NOT a high end instrument therefor cannot compare to a high-end custom. Bottom line you get what you pay for BUT that can be improved upon with a little input. :)
Cool. You make a good point. :)
 
My only advice is to get it completely white as mentioned above. But by that I also mean dont let him do any electronics or routing for pickups or drill any holes at all lol. Also ask for no side markers. You might also go for a 2 octave neck rather than 3 octave.

I do think they sound good, and maybe if purchased as a barebones type thing like mentioned above, you could avoid all the downsides too them, or at least most of them.
 
I typed in Wishbass on the search engine and came up with a lot of Wish owners. I accessed a few sites and what surprised me was a whole lot of great looking Wish basses out there along with proud owners more than happy to post and brag about them. I also saw some Wishy's that were VERY nicely done in various exotic woods. I think Wish should post ALL the basses he has built in the past on his site, the special orders, not the ones he just builds to throw on EBAY. Some will be slightly surprised.
 
My Wish

I like the looks of my wish. My main complaint is with the neck. The action is too high on the bottom part of the neck...Hopefully it can be fixed with a setup. Overall the sound is very good, but Wish gets pretty sloppy with some things that could easily be solved with a little more attention.
 
Is there any problems with noise or feedback with that bridge pup being so close to the bridge? Is it active and have a good slap tone?? i know what I want but dont have the facility to build it. If wish would hire a few apprentices inrolled in luthier schools he might be able to turn that company around, Right now he's pretty successful being a so-so luthier. Too bad because it wouldnt take long to correct a few minor problems with his basses. :hmm:
 
I had a 10-string acoustic cittern built by Wish that I very much liked. I replaced the bridge and nut and modified the tailpiece to set it up properly. Replacing the bridge also made it sound much warmer and louder. The neck was straight and the fretwork good though not great. Sure sounded and played a thousand times better than the Wish mandocello I played earlier. Could have been more percussive and penetrating - it sounded nicely shimmery but too delicate for my liking. Sold it along with all my mandolins, banjos, guitars etc. cause I quit playing all non-bass instruments.
 
I enjoy my wishbass (lined fretless), I'm thinking of putting in a schaller bridge I have lying around, not a fan of the one that is on it right now. I'm also gonna have to go over the bottom part of the neck (may scoup it out) the last fret line is a little hight under the D and G strings. I have a pic somewhere in the post, but here it is again.
 
I had a bad experience with Wish. I made a very good template to get my own design. Wishnevsky just didn't follow the template well enough. The woods were poorly assembled (thick layer of glue with holes in it) and there was a huge crack in the body and sevral cracks in the ebony fingeboard, the pciup wasn't straight (not by design, by flaw). I returned the bass and lost 15% of restocking fee.
 
SebbyNC said:
I had a bad experience with Wish. I made a very good template to get my own design. Wishnevsky just didn't follow the template well enough. The woods were poorly assembled (thick layer of glue with holes in it) and there was a huge crack in the body and sevral cracks in the ebony fingeboard, the pciup wasn't straight (not by design, by flaw). I returned the bass and lost 15% of restocking fee.

Buying a wish that you have not seen in person, or that has not been certified for you by an honest owner, can certainly be a risky proposition. His basses sound great but they do have construction issues.

I've owned 3 of them-- 2 4's and a 7, all fretless. 2 of them- my Peanuts 4 and 7-- were almost perfect in terms of construction but the third, a "motley" Sam design of various melded woods, did not do so well. The body woods literally came apart on me minutes before I had to lay down some tracks for a film (I was in the studio when I noticed the separation) and the only thing holding the bass together was the thru-neck!

Wish fixed the bass for me but he must have done it quick and dirty, because it happened again just a week after I got it back. Needless to say I asked for my money back. I was fully refunded but I did lose lots of $$$ on shipping back and forth.

Still, I think Wishbasses sound amazing-- like no other bass I have ever owned and I do own some good stuff. I tracked 4 songs for a film using only my Sam and my Peanut 7, and the engineers still comment on how amazing they sounded.

I think the key to buying a wish is to get one pre-owned where the owner can give an accurate description so you know what you are getting into. The folks I sold my good Wishes to can certainly attest to that.

If you buy from Wish directly, insist on close-up pics so you can at least be sure that there are no rough edges, crooked parts, etc. Still, unless you are lucky as I was and get some good ones, you should be prepared to do some finishing on your wish. Wish sells these on the cheap because he admittedly spends a minimal amount of time on finishing and he uses lower grade woods. The former is not a problem if you don't mind doing the work, but if the woods are too flawed, too new, etc, you can have the problems I had with my Sam.
 
rogerbmiller said:
Buying a wish that you have not seen in person, or that has not been certified for you by an honest owner, can certainly be a risky proposition. His basses sound great but they do have construction issues.

I've owned 3 of them-- 2 4's and a 7, all fretless. 2 of them- my Peanuts 4 and 7-- were almost perfect in terms of construction but the third, a "motley" Sam design of various melded woods, did not do so well. The body woods literally came apart on me minutes before I had to lay down some tracks for a film (I was in the studio when I noticed the separation) and the only thing holding the bass together was the thru-neck!

Wish fixed the bass for me but he must have done it quick and dirty, because it happened again just a week after I got it back. Needless to say I asked for my money back. I was fully refunded but I did lose lots of $$$ on shipping back and forth.

Still, I think Wishbasses sound amazing-- like no other bass I have ever owned and I do own some good stuff. I tracked 4 songs for a film using only my Sam and my Peanut 7, and the engineers still comment on how amazing they sounded.

I think the key to buying a wish is to get one pre-owned where the owner can give an accurate description so you know what you are getting into. The folks I sold my good Wishes to can certainly attest to that.

If you buy from Wish directly, insist on close-up pics so you can at least be sure that there are no rough edges, crooked parts, etc. Still, unless you are lucky as I was and get some good ones, you should be prepared to do some finishing on your wish. Wish sells these on the cheap because he admittedly spends a minimal amount of time on finishing and he uses lower grade woods. The former is not a problem if you don't mind doing the work, but if the woods are too flawed, too new, etc, you can have the problems I had with my Sam.

Thanks for a very in-depth assessment (just found this thread through a Yahoo search BTW, couldn't find it on TB's search, oddly enough).

If I do order one, I'll be EXTREMELY specific and may well have it shipped in the white and put tung oil on it.
 
I just received one this week that I bought off Ebay. It's a 6 string fretless.

On the spots of the fretboard where it sounds good, it sounds good. But there are many places where the buzz is unbearable. There is no truss rod, and the bridge is not adjustable, so pending major mods, this thing is unplayable.

The good news is the guy I bought it from is a rare fellow: decent, humble, honest. He actually gave my my money back, and didn't want the bass returned to him!

So maybe I'll take it to a luthier. It does have potential.