TalkBass has been independent since 1998. Add your voice.
Create a free account to reply to discussions, view embedded media, and browse with fewer display ads.
Join free Log in
Want zero display ads or expanded classifieds tools? Compare plans.
you missed my point.
but you missed his, so i'm not surprised.
Nothing personal, but personal preference is subjective. Quality is objective.
In my experience, a good handmade instrument offers better build quality, attention to detail, fit and finish, material selection, and design refinement than a mass-produced, built to a mass-market price point instrument.
There are plenty of good reasons to choose, for example, a Pinto over a Porsche - lifestyle, cost, personal priorities, etc. - but no one can honestly say that the Pinto is empirically a 'better' vehicle.
read "zen and the art of motorcycle maintenance" for an interesting treatise about quality. it might also inspire you to learn how to repair the clutch on your porche.
It is interesting that many people who wouldn't spend $1500 on a bass would spend far more than that on a few. It's still the same amount of money spent.
![]()
Me, I've got a few boutique basses, but my Lakland DJ5 sees all the action...
All things being equal, I think most players will take the higher end instrument if they can. What is common is to see someone go from a coffee table bass to a Fender or Musicman style bolt-on. Now that boutique Fender clones are more common, going to a Fender style bass does not always mean going to a cheaper instrument.
+11111111
My thing is that I'd rather pay a couple of thousand or more for something I want than pay hundreds of dollars for something I don't want. Hundreds or thousands doesn't matter. It's all a lot of money. Life is too short.