• TalkBass has been independent since 1998. Add your voice.
    Create a free account to reply to discussions, view embedded media, and browse with fewer display ads.
    Join freeLog in
    Want zero display ads or expanded classifieds tools? Compare plans.

Why 5 Strings?

Flintc said:
For me, it wasn't so much to get the low notes as to cut down on the shifting. Which means I can grab the neck where the frets are a bit closer together and play the same notes a 4-string would be playing - and have some higher notes available as a bonus.
This is the main reason for me also. Keeps me up further on the neck where it's more comfortable to play.
 
canopener said:
To elaborate more specifically, going down low is used to get the "distorted wall of mud" sound used often today.

The low C on any of my Warwicks is as clear, clean and punchy as any other note. If you do not have the proper technique, stay away from the B string. All due respect, your elaboration is just plain horse pucky.
 
I like having that 5th under the notes on the E string.. for instance if I'm playing F# I can play the 5th (C#) below the root instead of above it (and pop a 5th octave in)... like:

---------------------------------------
---------------------------------------
----------------------------4----------
2-2-2----2-2-2----2-2-2-------2-2-----
-------2---------2-------2----------2--

low B ghost notes and passing notes are part of what I like playing on bass. And I love dropping down to the low D in the outro of some of our songs.. it just sounds unexpected as I don't hit it anywhere else in the song.. just sounds so HEAVY... love it..
 
My band plays a lot of dance-pop covers and I've found my 5'er very helpful. Several of the the bass parts on the orginal recordings go below a low E and the low B helps me replicate the low notes without detuning. For example, we play Black Horse and Cherry Tree, and playing the chorus (E-D-C) on the B string makes it sound huge and right.
 
I was teasin` with my comment that "dissed" the 5 string. My feeling is that if it works for you, great. And if you can make it sound fine, even greater.
The only shade of truth behind it (the comment) is that I personally dislike the sound of bass notes lower than E. Notes lower than low E sound too much like a "keyboard" bass, or something. It's also interesting to note that the most revolutionary bassists came from an era that did not have 5 strings; some of the most revolutionary/unique player and jazzers with god given talent; Doug Stegmeyer, Jaco Pastorious, Max Bennet, Chris Squire, Geddy Lee, etc, etc.

Now today, you have many fine players, but how many of them really push the envelope like the older guys did? There seems to be something missing in the "thoughtful" department.

Check this out; a recording of a local small-time band taped in 1975. Check out the killer walking bass lines. It's just so sensible. I melt to hear it. I wonder why anyone would need anymore than 4 strings?

Invalid Link Removed
 
Using a five string gives us more options. Not to say a four is limited. It's good to have options. I remember there was a period from about 1988 to '94 '95 you had to have a five if you walked into any R&B audition. That's what a lot of acts were asking for. Now you see them all 4's 5's and 6's good for us that they are all accepted.:bassist: