• TalkBass has been independent since 1998. Add your voice.
    Create a free account to reply to discussions, view embedded media, and browse with fewer display ads.
    Join freeLog in
    Want zero display ads or expanded classifieds tools? Compare plans.

Why a Gotoh 201 bridge over a standard Fender

I like mine. Eliminates saddle squirm (sideways movement). Sounds better. More highs, more lows. And it's louder. I always prefer what's acoustically louder, whether it's strings (LaBella M45, TI flats), or body wood (ultra light alder), or hardware, because it always sounds better to me (with only one exception, Pyramid Gold strings). The 201 is an exceptional value because you get about as much out of it as you can get out of a bridge. I like it a bit more than my Babicz (I have 2 of each). There is a thread here about a 201 clone that costs half as much. If the fit of the saddle elevation screw ends in the baseplate grooves is as good as on the Gotoh (this is what eliminates saddle squirm), then it would be an even better deal.
 
  • Like
Reactions: UK Philip
Two main advantages for replacing those thin bent metal fender bridges. First is playability. You dont have those sharp pokey edges and screw tops sticking way out the top of saddles. Imo the reason leo lut cover over the bridge was as hand protector against sharp pokey scratchy edges of his cheap bridges. 2nd advantage is little bit fuller sound with high mass bridge. The gotoh 201 barely qaulifies for the latter but doesnt bite and gnaw at your hand should it stray near it like the fender ones do..
 
  • Like
Reactions: imabuddha
Technically true, but if a difference is describable, it is good to describe it to a fellow TBer who requests that information.

And based on long experience in this forum, for every assertion of (A) as a result, there will be an assertion of (Not-A) in response.

But you have to admit the bridge will look different. That's the only result I can guarantee.

;)
 
  • Like
Reactions: Turnaround
As far as the lateral saddle movement on the Fender saddles, that has never been a problen for me, if it had, at most, I would have replaced the saddles with vintage Fender threaded saddles, solves the problem at a lesser cost.
Sustain and tone improvements? As there is nothing wrong with those elements on my basses with old-style bridges, why would I chance it that any bridge changes (whatever brand) might make slight improvements (slight being, from most reports from those who have done such swaps, the best I could hope for.) ?
It would be a silly waste of time and money.
Keep in mind, this is how I would feel about most aftermarket bridges, Baddass, Gotoh, or whatever.
 
And based on long experience in this forum, for every assertion of (A) as a result, there will be an assertion of (Not-A) in response.

No biggie. I told a friend to come here to ask his question, that half would give one answer and the other half would say the opposite, but that he had enough brains to determine which to go with. So it is still important to report what you hear with your own ears to someone who asks.
 
As far as the lateral saddle movement on the Fender saddles, that has never been a problen for me, if it had, at most, I would have replaced the saddles with vintage Fender threaded saddles, solves the problem at a lesser cost.
Sustain and tone improvements? As there is nothing wrong with those elements on my basses with old-style bridges, why would I chance it that any bridge changes (whatever brand) might make slight improvements (slight being, from most reports from those who have done such swaps, the best I could hope for.) ?
It would be a silly waste of time and money.
Keep in mind, this is how I would feel about most aftermarket bridges, Baddass, Gotoh, or whatever.


This - pretty much word for word...


- georgestrings